marcinzm

11 ms·

91.
by marcinzm 2y ago
As I see it, it is an option but there is a cost. You're making an absolute statement when it seems like it's that you view the practical cost of choosing the option as too high. Which is fair but you're refusing to explain t
92.
by marcinzm 2y ago
>It's really astounding incompetence/dysfunction. The word is probably "corruption."
93.
by marcinzm 2y ago
This feels like a Helm replacement and not a Terraform replacement in any real way. Which is fine but confusing when the post begins with Terraform. Terraform can create an K8S cluster. This requires an K8S cluster to work. Etc.
94.
by marcinzm 2y ago
It's called the legal system. It's there to resolve these issues and it did. edit: As for the rest of your question. You're perfectly "free" to commit fraud or any other crime but, again, we have a legal system that
95.
by marcinzm 2y ago
> 1) I have little time for internet drama Yet create an account and join in you did.
96.
by marcinzm 2y ago
> A government declaring a curfew (for any reason) is a bad thing, IMO, As I see it, in a well running society there is enough trust to give everyone flexibility in the short term. If everyone assumes worst intentions and outcomes then y
97.
by marcinzm 2y ago
Sure but I was responding to the point that a diary can't be searched. It can be. The key difference is that doing this for analog conversations was expensive for the police as it required them to devote finite human time. Digital is n
98.
by marcinzm 2y ago
> Invading the privacy of one's digital space is a violation that goes as deep as reading someone's diary when we look back and the time when life was more analog. Which police with a warrant can very much do.
99.
by marcinzm 2y ago
> You're taking a specific example and trying to make a general rule out of it. I used a specific example to disprove a straw men about the impact of tech choices on latency. Then I brought up a second personal example (e-commerce s
100.
by marcinzm 2y ago
Amazon nowadays has a near monopoly powered by ad money due to the low margin on selling products versus ad spend. So unless you happen to be in the same position using them nowadays as an example isn't going to be very helpful. If the
101.
by marcinzm 2y ago
In my experience, the people who make these arguments often don't even know their own tech stack of choice well enough to make it work halfway efficiently. They say 10ms but that assumes someone who knows the tech stack, the tradeoffs
102.
by marcinzm 2y ago
> extra 10 milliseconds you saved Strawmen arguments are no fun so let's look at an actual example: https://www.rippling.com/blog/the-garbage-collector-fights-b... P99 of 3 SECONDS. App stalls for 2-4 SECONDS.
103.
by marcinzm 2y ago
It's not hatred. It's self-interest. The very heart of capitalism. A rational response to incentive structures. You're the one sacrificing your own self-interest for pride and are upset that others refuse to do so. edit: And
104.
by marcinzm 2y ago
The co-workers that matter the most for networking are the ones playing the same game. They will move to new companies more quickly and try to rise up the ranks more quickly. They will know how to write a good referral because they want to
105.
by marcinzm 2y ago
> A lot of younger developers like to come into a new project and slap on the latest frameworks or coding practices that they've picked up recently, without acknowledging that breaking the standards of the project lead to higher men
106.
by marcinzm 2y ago
The topic is if the federal government is ignoring free speech laws in this specific instance. I'm arguing it's not. As for public good, you'd probably find it depressing what the majority of Americans view as good.
107.
by marcinzm 2y ago
And employees signed contracts which allow the government to tell them how to do their jobs or fire them. Just like any other employer. Harvard did not.
108.
by marcinzm 2y ago
That's an employer telling employees what to do? Google can tell the same thing to it's employees and does. I don't see the relevance to the government telling other entities what to do.
109.
by marcinzm 2y ago
Advances that don't get wide adoption may as well not exist. Except for a few privileged people. Capitalism has been shown to drive wider adoption of advances more so than a lack of capitalism.
110.
by marcinzm 2y ago
Until your datacenter and the one next to it and all your backups literally burn down. Don't make life decisions on edge cases. One way or the other.
111.
by marcinzm 2y ago
Sure. My point is that cannot magically assume all of that will go away in the future when making forecasts on the impact of changes.
112.
by marcinzm 2y ago
I wonder if the real limit is tunnels. Connectivity doesn't fix the issue of physical limits on tunnel capacity and the massive cost of new tunnels.
113.
by marcinzm 2y ago
That's a separate issue versus trains going to/from NYC. They do.
114.
by marcinzm 2y ago
You do realize that Manhattan is only 14 miles long? With a stop every 3 miles even a Shinkansen wouldn't reach 100mph before it had to start slowing down again.
115.
by marcinzm 2y ago
The PATH train does exactly that.
116.
by marcinzm 2y ago
Trains do go into New Jersey from NYC. Just not MTA trains.
117.
by marcinzm 2y ago
I'm not convinced it'd pay for itself since maintenance still needs to be done so it's not really 6 minutes 24/7. The 7 train in theory runs on weekends and in theory runs fairly often. In practice it's down every o
118.
by marcinzm 2y ago
Even if it was covered it will definitely fly under the radar for the next four years at least.
119.
by marcinzm 2y ago
I never said people were better off in one or the other nor is this a discussion about that. This is a discussion of the societal differences driving startups and risky investments.
120.
by marcinzm 2y ago
From what I can tell the millionaire discrepancy existed in 2010 as well when the per capita GDPs between Germany/France/UK and the US were fairly close. The gini index for the US is much higher so it's not surprising that th

More ›