Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
marcinzm
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
51 ms
·
601.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
Are you assuming clients will actually upgrade the library on a regular basis?
602.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
The general issue I've found with people that take this mindset is that they focus so much on the 0.000000001% risks that they miss a lot of 1% risks. Which I would say is unscientific in terms of minimizing ones risks.
603.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
> Sure, there's places where it's good, but it's always a balance - and large mailing lists are often a poor place for actual discussion and instead just get flooded with what ends up being "spam" to many viewers
604.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
If you consider it "loud" to be able to send out an email of five things to a group in a structured format that everyone at the company uses then I think we should just agree to disagree. I see that as not loud but having the expe
605.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
As I see it if you don't have the self-awareness and feedback gathering skills to understand the things that aren't going well then no amount of "professional development" will help you succeed at a high impact executive
606.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
> Otherwise you claim omnicience. No, he simply claims the team was already competent enough to execute at the level required and without egos weighting them down.
607.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
>So refreshing when you've come from a company where everyone knew a project was doomed, but nobody had the guts to pull the plug for months. And then the person who pulls the plug is blamed for it somehow.
608.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
It seems to me that someone who can directly voice their views is a more efficient employee than someone who needs another person (their manager) to use their time do it for them. A company biasing to more efficient employees seems reasonab
609.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
>Wouldn’t in large meetings mostly the loudest and most political be heard? How do you hear everyone in a large meeting? Who takes credit, assumes responsibility, be more or less paid, etc? The top-5 mailing lists seem like the way that
610.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
>Of course for people who may not be comfortable in social settings, 1:1s may be the only thing they can grapple with properly. In my experience, group discussions favor a very small subset of people, and it has less to do with comfort i
611.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
That doesn't help with non-deterministic failures and I've also yet to see a true "write once, run anywhere" system ever. It may be 99% "write once, run anywhere" but there's always that 1% edge case.
612.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
>But again, to me it is symptomatic of a larger issue where I feel that more and more, kids are not taught to have a sense or standard in the quality of their work and improve upon it, regardless of the particular skill. You mean so they
613.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
And those are given out like candy on Halloween by cops to anyone they vaguely know.
614.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
>If the public transport systems were that good, why would anyone need to drive in? People take transit method A if it's better than transit method B no matter how shitty A is in absolute terms. And the US has invested 50 years into
615.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
In my experience corporations respond more often to bad publicity than they do to actionable feedback in terms of larger changes like this. One big reason is that often they already got that actionable feedback during the planning of this p
616.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
>It gives no details about why whatever the new feature is bad, or what was good about the prior behavior. Isn't that the job of the PMs at Github and not the users saying they don't like the new experience?
617.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
I wonder if Microsoft hired a few too many laid off Meta and Twitter product people.
618.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
What I noticed decently often is that the safe decisions you can make are fairly constrained. By safe I mean that even if things don't go well you will not be held too responsible in a material way. This might be communicated directly
619.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
Are you fine getting $0 salary for the year if your area of ownership doesn't do well that year?
620.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
You can already do that afaik. HuggingFace even provides some nice notebook examples on how to achieve it with AWS SageMaker and HuggingFace libraries. You don't need anywhere near 100-1000 GPUs to fine tune which makes it a much easie
621.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
Not counting the cost of learning how to cluster together 500 GPUs, the cost of learning how to train models efficiently on 500 GPUs, the cost of convincing a cloud provider to let you get 500 GPUs, the cost of trying to find a cloud provid
622.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
Change scares people. This has been the case for every single technological invention including writing. Predicting the transformative impact of a technology is nearly impossible (or sci-fi writers would have a better hit ratio) but thinkin
623.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
As I see it for country to disconnect from AI they'd need to go fully isolationist. Disconnect the internet fully from the rest of the world, block all mail, block all imports, disconnect all financial markets, etc. Otherwise they'
624.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
Define AI.
625.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
>And I sincerely hope they are used against AI to make AI unprofitable. No, they'll make AI unprofitable for small time creators but not massive corporations. The latter either already have rights to vast quantitates of training dat
626.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
Wouldn't a plantation also be less likely to burn as it's maintained better as there is a monetary incentive to do so?
627.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
Pre-2022 everyone was getting tons of money for everything.
628.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
They raised in Jan 2022 before the AI boom so it's not due to that but rather to the pre-2022 VC culture driven by low interest rates.
629.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
EKS came later and for a long time was basically barely working. Better now but still has odd things like no free tier. The problem is that GCP for some reason just doesn't align with many corporate customer requirements (ie: support,
630.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
In theory good kubernetes integration makes GCP have a competitive advantage.
More ›