Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
marcinzm
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
41 ms
·
631.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
Also a completely false stat. The link goes to a site that links to this: https://activetrans.org/sites/files/crash%20report%202018%20... It among other fun things only goes up to 2016 and was published in mid 201
632.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
>I suspect a lot of this stems from the fact that around half of Americans have never left the continent of North America [ It may also have something to do with the UK having almost 10x the population density of the US.
633.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
My question to you is: why do people spend money on those glorified stage plays and not just spend all their money on Hollywood movies? It's likely that Hollywood movies just don't align perfectly with the local culture due to lim
634.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
>Essentially, everyone is 'on the same page' for the better of the business. So they're essentially unworkable as a company gets beyond maybe 50-100 individuals as that is maximum for a unified human social group taking in
635.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
>PIP Have you ever talked to an engineer that was forced to work with someone on their team who providing negative value? That doesn't drive collaboration, that drives low morale and eventually people moving on. If you need to ident
636.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
Not having a ranking/promotion/PIP system also eventually creates pathological behaviors in the company baring temporary situations of near infinite revenue unrelated to what employees do.
637.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
If a company wants to rank engineers then there is always a metric to rank engineers. That metric may simply be how much the manager or director likes each engineer. That's still a metric and it still can be gamed (ie: classic kiss ass
638.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
More likely they're afraid the hire will be too bad (and not even realize it). Anyone can be a CEO. Start an LLC and make yourself the CEO. Done. It's a meaningless title without context.
639.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
>Given that, how is one supposed to reply critically to such a post? I'm genuinely curious and open to suggestions, as it's something I'm clearly not good at. Link to or describe a better approach and explain specifically
640.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
Definitely, the fact they're rent seeking against similar small companies clearly shows that. Sad that rather than looking inward to improve themselves they've decided to just attack others.
641.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
As I see it Hashicorp has failed to create a viable business model in an environment where there isn't unlimited perpetual VC money. Now they're at the stage of giving up and simply trying to shake down those who have managed to m
642.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
>That ten-year investment cycle was invented for a world where early stage companies could quickly gain access to public capital, a world that ended with devastating Sarbanes-Oxley act. I'm sure this had nothing to do with the massi
643.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
Meta blocked the news content, no more stealing according to your own line of argument, how is that a bad outcome? You can't have it both ways that this is stealing so it's bad but that not stealing is also bad because "reaso
644.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
Huh? News organizations are explicitly asking third parties to take their content and helping them do so... I'm not sure how that is an argument for third parties taking that content by force. In fact they're now complaining that
645.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
Reading the text of the law it would count as news if it ties to any issue or event of public interest. I'm actually having difficulty thinking of a post by a large organization that wouldn't fall under that definition.
646.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
Reading the law, if a news outlet makes a post that counts as "news content" such as commenting on any ongoing public issues (including this very topic) then Meta would be potentially liable for it under the law. So unless Meta ha
647.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
I'm saying that the effect is much much more impactful than they make it seem with their one line throwaway comment in a long article.
648.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
One of the points of the article seemed to be to do gating latter rather than earlier. I'm saying that this is detrimental as being around the dullest stars will make you a dull star more often than not.
649.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
This article misses the simple fact that the type of fellow students you have will impact how well you do as a student. Humans are social creatures and will influence each other's behavior. That's not even getting into negative pr
650.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
The single fastest hire my department did recently was for an EM position. Took something like under two weeks from opening the position to signed offer. No one had ever seen anything like it before.
651.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
As I see there is an advantage for managers in terms of rising up the corporate ranks. Management titles form a strict hierarchy. So if your company grow from 10 engineer to 100 engineers then someone needs to be a Director because you &quo
652.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
>As someone who got laid off recently, it sure as heck doesn’t feel that way. Managers are not having any easier of a time finding jobs right now.
653.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
Yeah, Netflix pays this much not because it will replace a near minimum wage writer but because optimizing their advertising tier by 1% will pay back more than the PMs salary every 30 days.
654.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
Define AI.
655.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
The article they link to about the job says as much so I'd say the author is very much trying to drive a narrative to push an agenda even if one doesn't exist.
656.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
> But almost at that same moment, Netflix has listed a $900,000 job opening for an AI guru. That doesn’t feel like a balanced approach to me. They listed a $900k position for someone who does machine learning platform planning. Every sin
657.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
It doesn’t take someone being overly obsessed but merely reposting once in a blue moon.
658.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
It seems like the author really just wants their ideas to be listened to without having to put the political effort into making them listened to. Previously that effort was playing the bureaucracy and now that effort was kissing up to Musk.
659.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
The rolling waves of drama around Musk's latest "idea" eventually got more annoying to read on my Following feed so I left Twitter.
660.
▲
by
marcinzm
3y ago
The same way the non-theoretical Firefox business makes money. edit: Safari as well.
More ›