mapcars

33 ms·

361.
by mapcars 7y ago
>From a different perspective, we can do better But how do you decide what is better? Maybe evolution goes with a perfect speed in relation to all other forces? It's like you may want the planet to spin faster to get more birthday p
362.
by mapcars 7y ago
+1, this can go wrong in so many ways
363.
by mapcars 7y ago
Because these non-ideal "definers" have their own limitations which they are not aware of, otherwise they would fix themselves and already be ideal. These limitations will inevitably get into the designing process and the result.
364.
by mapcars 7y ago
I remember studying with Delphi, don't remember any specific advantage for studying compared to let's say Java. On the other hand I remember many things seemed illogical.
365.
by mapcars 7y ago
And great thing is we all will get to know the answer :D
366.
by mapcars 7y ago
Try to imagine how would it be going to sleep forever. Try to imagine how would it be waking up without ever going to sleep. Spend some time in this with full attention, something might change in you.
367.
by mapcars 7y ago
>fixing the whole system with an ideal person. How can non-ideal persons define what an ideas person is? This is just a mental game.
368.
by mapcars 7y ago
The guy thinks morality is required, but it is not.
369.
by mapcars 7y ago
This is what should be shown when US presidents talks about democracy, values, rights and bla bla bla
370.
by mapcars 7y ago
I don't think some specific lisp is required, the one which compiles to C should be good enough. Active example is https://gitlab.com/owl-lisp/owl
371.
by mapcars 7y ago
Is it? Can it compete with c# or swift for desktop applications?
372.
by mapcars 7y ago
Our focus on results (and in turn expectations) is completely wrong. The result is subject to million things which are not in our control. The only thing we can do is to do our part as well as possible and enjoy whatever the result there is
373.
by mapcars 7y ago
Global Force Wrestling, right? :D
374.
by mapcars 7y ago
>you can only observe it in yourself I don't think you can really observe it either. I doesn't look like I can name any property of "it", I can only be aware of "it".
375.
by mapcars 7y ago
>core philosophical problem of how we (or anything else) is able to experience anything at all By `how` you mean the mechanics of it or something else?
376.
by mapcars 7y ago
Again, you put restriction of meaningful answer. But why not beautiful answer? Or poetic answer? Or funny one? Ultimately you still decided what you want first and then trying to find what fits.
377.
by mapcars 7y ago
I don't think I missed anything, if you already decided what is wrong - this is not a honest search - you just want to find something which satisfies your views.
378.
by mapcars 7y ago
>There's plenty of value in the subjective But in turn I can say everything you know and experience about the world is subjective. It came through your senses and you have no way to know if it was the same with other people.
379.
by mapcars 7y ago
>If I ask, why is the sky blue, I don't want to hear "Because it's made of blue stuff." Well, you are not going far if you hear only what you want to hear. PS sky is blue because you perceive it as blue.
380.
by mapcars 7y ago
The consciousness itself (not the theory) is in the root of what we perceive and exercising it effectively broads our perception of reality which is the single most practical thing one can do because everything else we do is limited by our
381.
by mapcars 7y ago
>20 years on, and nobody has ever found anything signed with this "NSAKEY". Hm, wouldn't Microsoft make a proof by singing something publically with a private key?
382.
by mapcars 7y ago
I'm trying to understand what it means - does it mean your code have to have a symbol called `_NSAKEY`? Or how does it affect compliance?
383.
by mapcars 7y ago
Is discord known to be used in corporate sector? I think so far it's dominated by Slack and Discord is mostly used by games/communities.
384.
by mapcars 7y ago
Too much for the kind of simulator you can imagine? But if your imagination is simulated how can you use it as a reference?
385.
by mapcars 7y ago
There is no such thing as "unreality". What you talking about is just a concept inside our mind which itself is inside reality. We can create any number of concepts but they all are limited by the limitation of our perception. The
386.
by mapcars 7y ago
Easily? Any proof that it had been done?
387.
by mapcars 7y ago
Interesting I think it requires a lot of software changes to support such screen layouts and changes (in case of physical keyboard)
388.
by mapcars 7y ago
>where they end up wishing they had never been born This has nothing to do with future, tech or anything like this. This has to do with the way we structure our society and our lives today, right now.
389.
by mapcars 7y ago
Honestly that's rather expected from EA :D
390.
by mapcars 7y ago
[ ] You require the compiler to be present at runtime [ ] You require the language runtime to be present at compile-time The guy never heard of Lisp so I wouldn't pay much attention to this anyway.

More ›