6 ms·
>From a different perspective, we can do better But how do you decide what is better? Maybe evolution goes with a perfect speed in relation to all other forces
by mapcars 7y ago
>From a different perspective, we can do better
But how do you decide what is better? Maybe evolution goes with a perfect speed in relation to all other forces? It's like you may want the planet to spin faster to get more birthday presents but this will ruin nature's processes in so many ways.
- ben_w 7y agoEvolution isn’t a force. As I was replying to someone who already has a goal in mind, I’m referring to that goal: balance. Of course, evolution also doesn’t have real goals, only local optimisations, so that makes it rather easy to beat at whatever goal we set for ourselves.
- mapcars 7y ago>Evolution isn’t a force. In a way it is, it goes towards more complicated ways of perception. I wounder if there is any example where some species became less complicated compared to it's ancestors? >so that makes it rather easy to beat at whatever goal we set for ourselves Since worked wonderfully for billions of years without "real" goals, wouldn't it be a mistake to try to set goals by ourselves?
- ben_w 7y ago> is any example where some species became less complicated compared to it's ancestors? Malaria, apparently. (I’m not a biologist, that claim just happened to be on the Wikipedia page I read). > Since worked wonderfully If you’re going to criticise me for saying “better”, please define what you mean by “wonderfully”. > wouldn't it be a mistake to try to set goals by ourselves? Given evolution produced us, if it was a mistake, it would be evolution’s mistake by creating entities capable of such.