Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
lz400
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
31.
▲
by
lz400
5mo ago
I feel there are like 50 load bearing assumptions in this piece of fiction that are dubious at best, definitely speculation. When you put all of them together and chain them in a product of probabilities it becomes tech bro wish fulfilling
32.
▲
by
lz400
5mo ago
It could be the painting is real and those comments were written by AI
33.
▲
by
lz400
6mo ago
About time, this was crazy and should result in some action against cloudflare for allowing it
34.
▲
by
lz400
6mo ago
I use claude code everyday. Most of my friend circle have a CC max subscription and we talk about and use AI all the time. Not a single one has installed openclaw yet. For me personally I don't see that it can do a lot of things that C
35.
▲
by
lz400
6mo ago
I just learnt that em dash in a mac is option+shift+hyphen. I hadn't realized it was so difficult and inconvenient, and in the end it looks so similar to the other one: — -. Thin value. It's no surprise humans barely use them. The
36.
▲
by
lz400
8mo ago
Top 200 that work partially in public. A good example is Mitchell Hashimoto. Works open source, uses AI a lot and writes about it. Next gen AI will learn from the lessons people like him share
37.
▲
by
lz400
8mo ago
I mean, having a curated dataset of the works and posts of the top 200 coders in the world (at least the public ones) is not very difficult. I’m sure these articles like the one in OP will be very easy to mark as “high value training data”.
38.
▲
by
lz400
8mo ago
>Hmm... How will it filter out those by the dumbest coders in the world? if you know, and I know, and the guys at openai and anthropic know... not a big leap that the models will know too? many datasets are curated and labeled by humans
39.
▲
by
lz400
8mo ago
The best thing about this is that AI bots will read, train on and digest the million "how to write with AI" posts that are being written right now by some of the smartest coders in the world and the next gen AI will incorporate al
40.
▲
by
lz400
9mo ago
Makes me think of the concept of involution in Chinese business and how they understand all of this very differently, and how difficult it is to compete because of that.
41.
▲
by
lz400
9mo ago
I do a lot of data processing and my tool of choice is polars. It's blazing fast and has (like pandas) a lot of very useful functions that aren't in SQL or are awkward to emulate in SQL. I can also just do Python functions if I wa
42.
▲
by
lz400
10mo ago
This is not to me but a friend of mine was climbing Mt Fuji in _winter_ (this is a serious thing you need to be prepared for, alpine climbing with lots of snow and ice) when he slipped and started sliding down the mountain out of control. W
43.
▲
by
lz400
10mo ago
In the meanwhile... Google should demand another $1bn from Disney to crush the lawsuit https://techcrunch.com/2025/12/11/disney-hits-google-with-ce...
44.
▲
by
lz400
10mo ago
I have similar stories, I showed the Confluent consultants a projection of their Kafka quote vs Kinesis and it was like 10x, even they were confused. The ingress/egress costs are insane. I think they just do very deep discounts to cert
45.
▲
by
lz400
11mo ago
If you see the bitcoin charts, price has gone up a lot in the last few years but volume has tanked. Do I read this right that now crypto is basically a smaller market where a bunch of whales scam a ever dwindling but never completely disapp
46.
▲
by
lz400
11mo ago
What would it take to reconnect there? evidence that FSD and robots are vaporware?
47.
▲
by
lz400
11mo ago
It would be funny if what you get from a read only human brain is a sort of memento guy who has no capacity to remember anything or follow a conversation... kind of like an LLM!
48.
▲
by
lz400
1y ago
I'm not an expert but as far I understand, plasticity is central to most complex operations of the brain and is likely to be involved in anything more complex than instinctive reactions. I'm happy to be corrected but it is my unde
49.
▲
by
lz400
1y ago
I mean, _we_ probably can't think with our wetware on a read-only substrate. It doesn't establish it as essential, just that the only sure example in nature of thought doesn't work that way.
50.
▲
by
lz400
1y ago
>If we took your brain and perfectly digitized it on read-only hardware, would you expect to still “think”? it wouldn't work probably, brains constantly alter themselves by forming new connections. Learning is inseparable from our i
51.
▲
by
lz400
1y ago
Even if/when the bubble pops, I don't think NVIDIA is even close to need rescuing or being in trouble. They might end being worth 2 trillion instead of 5 but they're still selling GPUs nobody else knows how to make that power
52.
▲
by
lz400
1y ago
Very interesting story. If I may ask, looking back, do you blame Montessori for the “lack of real world preparation” or do you think rather that it was the regular school that had a bad system and you were in a better one and should have st
53.
▲
by
lz400
1y ago
I want to offer a different data point. I took my daughter to a Montessori-adjacent school for 3 years. It's not Montessori exactly and they didn't advertise as such but they had a different European name attached to it that is do
54.
▲
by
lz400
1y ago
That's not correct. It counts the total number of school shootings. Some of those shootings had no victims. The total of students shot is also provided with some more elaboration with charts here. https://www.abc.net.au/
55.
▲
by
lz400
1y ago
I think there are actually more school shootings than mass shootings because mass requires ~4 victims and school doesn't. There were ~330 shootings in 2024. 70 people died. 200 wounded. https://www.abc.net.au/news/
56.
▲
by
lz400
1y ago
>School shootings in 2024 dipped slightly from the year before, but the 330 school shootings recorded last year still mark the second-highest number since 1966 https://www.k12dive.com/news/school-shootings-2024-near-
57.
▲
by
lz400
1y ago
You guys had a shooting last year, but school shootings in the US average to ~1 per day
58.
▲
by
lz400
1y ago
> And listeners/consumers can tell the difference between art created with intent and soul, and a pale imitation of that. Strong disagree there. I think that's true of a very small % of consumers nowadays. I mean, total honesty
59.
▲
by
lz400
1y ago
What I find repugnant (but not surprising) is that with the same earnestness and confidence they're announcing that RTOs are for the betterment of their own workforce, they were announcing the same thing about WFH just a couple of year
60.
▲
by
lz400
1y ago
This reminds me of donating again, thanks
More ›