lustysocietyorg

10 ms·

31.
by lustysocietyorg 8y ago
Maybe the most shocking example of bad UN sanctions pushed by the US: Madeleine Albright says 500,000 dead Iraqi Children was "worth it" wins Medal of Freedom https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omnskeu-puE Canada wa
32.
by lustysocietyorg 8y ago
> A country locking up a foreigner for breaking their laws It is absolutely crazy to think that US law should apply worldwide. The article does not even mention if Wanzhou Meng is US citizen who broke US law in the US. This case might be
33.
by lustysocietyorg 8y ago
Rare earth is not "that" rare. Not every rare earth element is equally rare. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rare-earth_element Quote: Despite their name, rare-earth elements are – with the exception of the rad
34.
by lustysocietyorg 8y ago
AFAIK use of hydrogen is inefficient in several ways (creation, storage) and thus there is no reason to expect that hydrogen fuel is the next big thing for cars. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YNV8qi_rJBg IMO the next big
35.
by lustysocietyorg 8y ago
This is my opinion about IP: https://lustysociety.org/property.html#ip You are right that I am against European intellectual property and intellectual property in general. The industry should be open for or even leading mod
36.
by lustysocietyorg 8y ago
IMO this "attack on intellectual property" is probably used to create their own world class technology. The USA attacked European IP centuries ago to build its own industry. Probably South Korea and Japan and any other advanced c
37.
by lustysocietyorg 8y ago
Any content is quickly recognizable as what it is unless it looks serious and not clickbaity and was created to promote lies. E.g. the Yugoslav war lies and the Iraq war lies and Libya war lies or Syria war lies and Russia "war" l
38.
by lustysocietyorg 8y ago
> To fight fake news, we'd have to go to the sources True. But many people do not check sources and do not want sources. The more sources you link, the more likely your message is ignored or downvoted or considered spam. Some commen
39.
by lustysocietyorg 8y ago
I will not further defend the points that I have made and still make. You just call it lies and link a book that I will not buy. Probably because you can not find valid information against my standpoint on the internet. Wolves are presented
40.
by lustysocietyorg 8y ago
> But that point is not relevant to the post you replied to Yes it is. Remember: >>> So is it possible some people don't really need fish oil for well-being? Evolution might have rendered eating fish useless for these peopl
41.
by lustysocietyorg 8y ago
> People who lived in areas without fish also lived in areas without algae. The point is that EPA and DHA is not made by fish. EPA and DHA can be bought in vegan form. EPA and DHA are not even considered as essential fatty acids. Unlike
42.
by lustysocietyorg 8y ago
Yes, absolutely. Fish oil is not needed at all. The EPA and DHA in fish was initially produced by algae anyway. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Essential_fatty_acid The 2 essential fatty acids are: - alpha-linolenic acid
43.
by lustysocietyorg 8y ago
Thanks. Many people would consider many links as spam as they prefer personal opinions without further facts and efforts. The videos are already quite concentrated so I doubt that many lines of written text would be beneficial enough. The m
44.
by lustysocietyorg 8y ago
It depends on how you define epigenetics. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epigenetics > Epigenetics most often denotes changes that affect gene activity and expression ... > The standard definition of epigenetics r
45.
by lustysocietyorg 8y ago
I am surprised that the article does not mention the word epigenetics. - Epigenetics and the influence of our genes | Courtney Griffins https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTBg6hqeuTg But there are also other, probably more imp