Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
luke0016
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
31.
▲
by
luke0016
8y ago
I mean, the crew part of it is water proof, right? It has to be air tight... I'm guessing there are things on the "outside" that might still have issues?
32.
▲
by
luke0016
8y ago
Sure, it doesn't bother me a whole bunch, I just thought I'd point out that, at least with Fedora, ZoL is occasionally behind tracking the most recent kernel release.
33.
▲
by
luke0016
8y ago
> ZFS modules do "break" often due to internal API changes, but the fix is usually shipped in ZFS stable before the kernel itself is shipped. Only people who follow ZoL development closely ever see the sausage being made. Eh, i
34.
▲
by
luke0016
8y ago
Who is the main alternative to Coinbase when it comes to Bitcoin? (I've used Coinbase in the past, and would like to know for the future...)
35.
▲
by
luke0016
8y ago
Oh, this is going to be great. Thank you for the link! And, replacing disks one by one would require me to buy 3 disks instead of 1. I did that the last time I grew my array :-/
36.
▲
by
luke0016
8y ago
shrug I knew plenty about ZFS at the time - just not that particular fact. I was also making the point that "make a new vdev" doesn't solve that particular problem. Overall, I'm quite happy with ZFS.
37.
▲
by
luke0016
8y ago
>>Expanding a RAID vdev is not possible, instead the recommendation is to waste 50% of storage for a pool of mirrored devices to get the same protection as a RAID1 of two drives, which isn't much for some people >Or make a new
38.
▲
by
luke0016
8y ago
I have a core file server that has a 9TB RAID-Z array in it. This server uses key-based authentication to connect to all of my other hosts - my desktop, VPS, work systems, etc and uses rsync to copy any changes to a locally maintained copy.
39.
▲
by
luke0016
8y ago
Of course not. I go in, I vote, the vote is recorded electronically, and a piece of paper that only indicates who was voted for is spit out. No personally identifiable information. It's not like this is hard. We were doing paper secret
40.
▲
by
luke0016
8y ago
If we had paper trails, this claim could be even more confidently asserted.
41.
▲
by
luke0016
8y ago
Are paleontologists and paleobotanists different from "animal historians?"
42.
▲
by
luke0016
8y ago
This includes underground tests, right?
43.
▲
by
luke0016
8y ago
Some are that complex. There are commercial systems that can essentially land a plane all by itself, called CAT IIIb. The pilot takes over after the plane is completely on the ground. In the future the planes will probably be able to taxi w
44.
▲
by
luke0016
8y ago
Thankfully the particular website in question already spits out a file listing for you.
45.
▲
by
luke0016
8y ago
What? No, it works fine with http out of the box. From the man page: GNU Wget is a free utility for non-interactive download of files from the Web. It supports HTTP, HTTPS, and FTP protocols, as well as retrieval through HTTP proxies.
46.
▲
by
luke0016
8y ago
wget?
47.
▲
by
luke0016
9y ago
That's why it's a bug?
48.
▲
by
luke0016
9y ago
I come from many years of mdadm use, sorry :-) Just so I understand, I should be able to run through whatever the final recommendation is for detecting orphans on the new pool with identical results as if it were run on the original pool, t
49.
▲
by
luke0016
9y ago
I understand - what I meant to say is that I cannot be sure that the array never ran into an ENOSPC issue prior to the snapshot. Given that, should I keep the old array around until I can do whatever is recommended to detect potential orpha
50.
▲
by
luke0016
9y ago
As far as I know, it has never experienced an ENOSPC error. It was mentioned elsewhere that a procedure is being developed to detect orphaned files that arise from this bug. Would it be a good idea for me to keep the original array around l
51.
▲
by
luke0016
9y ago
I have a fairly specific question - I'm in the process of migrating a large array onto another disk using zfs send and receive (6TB). It's been at it for about 2 days now. After the migration, I plan to destroy and recreate a larg
52.
▲
by
luke0016
9y ago
It's the opposite of fission. Fission produces energy by "destroying" matter (splitting it into smaller parts). Fusion produces energy by creating it (combining it into larger parts). The difference in mass between the inputs
53.
▲
by
luke0016
9y ago
> People seem to forget that adding a RAID controller creates a single point of failure instead of removing one. :-) At worst it does both. In most cases it really does just remove a single point of failure (a disk). Other non-RAID confi
54.
▲
by
luke0016
9y ago
> All of you ladies and gents who blow off your annual flu vaccine because "you just don't seem to ever catch it" - you're just lucky. It's only a matter of time with modern travel and climate change until anothe
55.
▲
by
luke0016
9y ago
I'm not sure how you come up with $10. Drives regularly last 5+ years. A single 1TB drive at $60 saves me $240 over Backblaze if it lasts 5 years. Throw in the safe, and I still save $180. Two drives and a safe? Still saving $120. I ha
56.
▲
by
luke0016
9y ago
Well, I did suggest a safe. But sure, there are other ways it could be destroyed. As for failure, presumably it's already a back up, so assuming the source didn't simultaneously fail, I can just replace the external drive. If this
57.
▲
by
luke0016
9y ago
> Backblaze B2 costs $0.005/GB/Mo (vs. $0.021/GB/Mo for S3). No reasonable person will have hardware at home that can compete with those prices. I don't get this. Suppose I have 1TB of data that I want to back up
58.
▲
by
luke0016
9y ago
It's fun to look for cycles. Looks like "Space and Beyond," "Journey under the Sea," and "By Balloon to the Sahara" could each provide a lifetime of reading...
59.
▲
by
luke0016
9y ago
He's neither. He, like most other members of the U.S. government, is someone simply interested in doing their job to the best of their ability. He's not immune to making mistakes. But, he's also not pushing some partisan agen