4 ms·

I understand - what I meant to say is that I cannot be sure that the array never ran into an ENOSPC issue prior to the snapshot. Given that, should I keep the o

I understand - what I meant to say is that I cannot be sure that the array never ran into an ENOSPC issue prior to the snapshot. Given that, should I keep the old array around until I can do whatever is recommended to detect potential orphans resulting from the bug? Edit: And thank you, again.

ryao 9y ago
There is no reason to do that here. Send/recv makes a perfect copy as far as this is concerned. You are welcome. Also, the proper term is pool.
- luke0016 9y ago
  I come from many years of mdadm use, sorry :-) Just so I understand, I should be able to run through whatever the final recommendation is for detecting orphans on the new pool with identical results as if it were run on the original pool, then?
  - ryao 9y ago
    Yes.