lugg

64 ms·

601.
by lugg 9y ago
+1. Traefik is leaps and bounds more ergonomic than haproxy etc. I believe it benched a bit worse than the comp but for most cases you're not going to run into issues.
602.
by lugg 9y ago
I think the drug analogy still fits. Like drugs, there will always be a "black market" but the "legalisation" lessens its strengths and effects.
603.
by lugg 9y ago
The readme states they have a few extra unreleased features. I'm guessing their changes are for internal use and may be out of scope for redis or simply they want to share their internal fork and get feedback/help. I know you didn
604.
by lugg 9y ago
Can anyone better versed in this suggest what the revelation might do to current climate models? - assuming they use a carbon/temperature ratio of some form?
605.
Carbon dioxide levels lower than thought during super greenhouse period(phys.org)
2 points by lugg 9y ago|1 comments
606.
by lugg 9y ago
Only when you're being pedantic.
607.
by lugg 9y ago
Is there a difference? Is there a reason we say Google and not ABC? The seperation is purely legal and financial, no?
608.
by lugg 9y ago
The above poster is also neglecting to realise Mozilla is not a normal business in it for profit (as far as I understand it - correct me if I'm wrong.) https://wiki.mozilla.org/Mozilla_Foundation_Projects The foundatio
609.
by lugg 9y ago
> How about the fact that black cabs wait to be hailed longer period of times because people choose Uber drives, thus adding more cars on the road instead of using the ones that are already there? You can't be serious.. - Price - Ac
610.
by lugg 9y ago
Not to mention: > While we haven't done any sort of official analysis of CPM changes here, the expected Sounds incredibly suspect. How could you make such a big change and not test it?
611.
by lugg 9y ago
Because biometrics are usually relatively publicly accessible information. Passwords aren't. You're arguing reproducibility. Well, your face can be replicated by a picture you put on Facebook, fingerprints are left everywhere you
612.
by lugg 9y ago
I feel like if they're determined enough the type of lock you use is irrelevant. The only reason I have a lock on my phone is so if I lose my phone somewhere randoms can't access it. If they're going to mug me for my phone th
613.
by lugg 9y ago
What's changed?
614.
by lugg 9y ago
You gotta pay to get 100% opaque.
615.
by lugg 9y ago
Been watching this for a few days with /r/tropicalweather. Amazing to watch. This site[1] has some really good info and daily videos with the rundown of the latest forecast [1] https://www.tropicaltidbits.com
616.
by lugg 9y ago
I think you could argue that small things like that can be done by a small team.
617.
by lugg 9y ago
Guessing because Facebook owns WhatsApp now.
618.
by lugg 9y ago
My bills? A better question might be: what can possibly replace email as an online identity - and also - do such a better job at it that I feel inclined to switch the 100's of services over to it - a task I would not take lightly. Emai
619.
by lugg 9y ago
People don't click random ads at random times. Google has more than enough training data to pick up on this traffic with a high degree of accuracy using rudimentary machine learning.
620.
by lugg 9y ago
> what alternative is there to find out who they are? Whether there is an answer to that or not is irrelevant to the fact the warrant lacks specificity. Same bullshit was used in the Kim dotcom debacle irrc. "We're not sure wha
621.
by lugg 9y ago
Email signups don't really validate your idea anymore, even if they manage to get you some emails. There was a post a while ago on Reddit where someone built this little project: https://fauxbuy.com Basically lets you add a
622.
by lugg 9y ago
I believe that may have been a subtle natural selection joke.
623.
by lugg 9y ago
It's not perfect but does the trick 9 out of 10 times, it just uses tfidf irrc.
624.
by lugg 9y ago
Or accidental variable reuse in a template. Could be either.
625.
by lugg 9y ago
Yea seems to ignore the obvious thing that maybe, just maybe, different teams have different needs. Distributed source control is awesome. But closed source Devs don't use git for that feature. We use it for fast local branch and merge
626.
by lugg 9y ago
Basically one in the same these days no? iirc mac os also does this with the cmd+space launcher. I think maybe even gnomes launcher does this as well.
627.
by lugg 9y ago
Whats your reasoning for holding out on this? Keyboard shortcut? Privacy concerns? Honestly curious because I feel the search bar has long since been made redundant. The only people I see using it in the wild is my parents/their friend
628.
by lugg 9y ago
It's pretty easy to just pay, I'll give you that. For an example of just how good their image is: I set my companies up almost a year ago, had to deal with it about once. The docs cover a HA setup (if you really need it - most won
629.
by lugg 9y ago
Most examples I've seen are all trying to produce text that makes sense based on nothing. Which seems kind of pointless. You can't create a message from nothing. What we really need is a way to take a bunch of facts, a key message
630.
by lugg 9y ago
GitHub is only source control. Docker is much more than dockerhub. I'd guess the valuation is based on the orchestration and hosting solutions much more than the container engine. They're competing with AWS and Google cloud on man

More ›