lucianbr

11 ms·

211.
by lucianbr 1y ago
Why are these alternatives? I believe it is true that the situation in the US is better than many other countries (not most), and also that "almost no corruption" is false. Being better than others really isn't the only thing
212.
by lucianbr 1y ago
Could be a sign that the commenter was not willing to spend all his day writing, especially once his point was made.
213.
by lucianbr 1y ago
> According to which laws? This part at least seems to be no problem. Many platforms already follow and enforce different rules in different jurisdictions. > And who decides whether the video actually violates the law? There are myri
214.
by lucianbr 1y ago
Oh they definitely can say other things. It's just that it would be inconvenient. They might lose money. I wonder if the laws and legal procedures are written considering this general assumption that a party to a lawsuit will natural
215.
by lucianbr 1y ago
> It has learned to adapt to the context Is this behavior really new, and learned? I think adapting to the context is what LLMs did from the start, and even if they did not, they do it now because it is programmed in, not "learned&
216.
by lucianbr 1y ago
Unauthorized access to a computer system. I'm sure if I connected to some port on a computer belonging to Meta without them wanting it, that would be the crime I would be charged with. But somehow if Meta connects to a port on my phone
217.
by lucianbr 1y ago
But that does not seem to apply in this case. At the very least it would have to "learn" again for each user of Cursor.
218.
by lucianbr 1y ago
So it would need to "learn" all over again each session. I don't think "Claude has learned how to jailbreak Cursor" is a correct way of expressing that. "Claude has learned" nothing. "Claude can somet
219.
by lucianbr 1y ago
I think the main problem is lots of money are made from it, and money influences politics hugely. The technical difficulties are low on the list of reasons this is not happening.
220.
by lucianbr 1y ago
> Machine god Slightly overreacting, I'd say.
221.
by lucianbr 1y ago
What does "learned" mean in this context? LLMs don't modify themselves after training, do they?
222.
by lucianbr 1y ago
Hear hear.
223.
by lucianbr 1y ago
Disagreeing with something is not debunking.
224.
by lucianbr 1y ago
Guessing an ordering that will trigger a bug and exploring all orderings should both be basically impossible for non-trivial scenarios, no?
225.
by lucianbr 1y ago
If only it was a random number generator. It's closer to a random action generator.
226.
by lucianbr 1y ago
The issue is not the package manager being hijacked but the package. And the package is often outside the "major distribution" repository. That's why you use curl | bash in the first place. Your question does not apply to the
227.
by lucianbr 1y ago
There are several 3 series diesel variants sold right now in my country, so maybe we need a bit more data gathering before drawing conclusions. It does seem like diesel is trending lower, but it's not gone yet, regardless whether you t
228.
by lucianbr 1y ago
Proof that solutions exist, if we want them. Whatever the cause of the apparent impunity of large corporations and rich people, it is not a lack of workable solutions. See also fines proportional to income, which now exist in multiple count
229.
by lucianbr 1y ago
I could be wrong but I think BMW and Mercedes still make diesel engines. So maybe it's only impossible at a lower price point? Although the difference isn't that large.
230.
by lucianbr 1y ago
It has been some years since VW had to give up cheating on emission tests. Were they beaten by US competitors during this time? I have not read any news about it.
231.
by lucianbr 1y ago
> No one will start a startup knowing they will have their house confiscated and go to prison if it fails. What does that have to do with anything? We're not discussing a case of VW making bad business decisions and losing money. If
232.
by lucianbr 1y ago
It's a large corporation. I'm certain someone asked that question and got an answer before starting producing Python tools. It's management's job to ask that question and get answers, you know.
233.
by lucianbr 1y ago
Do you think they're part of the military? Maybe think again.
234.
by lucianbr 1y ago
Agreed. But what can you do? People will comment what they will, and vote as they like.
235.
by lucianbr 1y ago
Read the rest of the comment thread. It is obviously not a singular opinion, as you seem to think.
236.
by lucianbr 1y ago
Couldn't agree more. It's basically a page with some pictures in it, and everything in it loaded so late for me that initially I wondered why they left so many large empty spaces in the page. This could work and be fast with tec
237.
by lucianbr 1y ago
> ...why? why would technology that specifically requires a lot of energy help "fight climate change"? There's no good reason it would. Nevertheless, proponents of both AI and crypto have claimed multiple times it would. S
238.
by lucianbr 1y ago
How much of that 500 TWh would disappear if you round to zero everything that consumes 3GWh per day or less? And keep in mind you are calculating for a single app (ChatGPT), nor for an entire industry or tech. Don't look at "civil
239.
by lucianbr 1y ago
> It applies immediately across Europe. Does anyone know what the consequences are? I have no idea exactly what it is that applies immediately. I would guess that starting today Google and others should stop advertising as they currently
240.
by lucianbr 1y ago
So a lot of companies try to avoid a lot of people? How does that work out? In my experience most companies work with a wide distribution of people. This "we avoid hiring people who have defects" reads as disconnected from reality

More ›