lstroud

11 ms·

61.
by lstroud 9y ago
Either scientific studies are infallible or politically influenced. If you believe the later, why would you trust those done under other administrations or governments more?
62.
by lstroud 9y ago
Free speech is not a sometime thing. Just ask 1926 Germany.
63.
by lstroud 9y ago
That's a pretty common practice in the Mfg industry. Makes lot tracking simpler.
64.
by lstroud 9y ago
Seems like we've had these Engagement vs Isolation conversations before in the US.
65.
by lstroud 9y ago
I thought you were only supposed to comply with laws you like. ;)
66.
by lstroud 9y ago
The question is how long you can maintain a pace (hours worked) before that pace begins to impact performance. Usain Bolt can't run his 100m pace for the duration of a 400m race.
67.
by lstroud 9y ago
Not all patches require reboots on many OSs. Some OS's even apply kernel patches live. :) They could have taken a more user friendly approach. I understand they were boxed in a little technically, but they built the box.
68.
by lstroud 9y ago
Stub generation? Remote access protocols? CORBA all over again? So, now I know the next big thing. Portable distributed objects. :-P
69.
by lstroud 9y ago
While I understand your exhaustion, I wonder why they aren't suing companies providing certifications with 'Engineer' in the title. Say, Cisco Certified Engineer, MCSE, etc. It would seem that it would be a far more egregiou
70.
by lstroud 10y ago
I would argue that databases tried to do too much for too long. If you want a database that has a built in web server, rest apis, security, etc...well Oracle has had that for years. Problem was, that wasn't what people wanted (or wante
71.
by lstroud 10y ago
Do we not consider the storefront and payment processing offerings business software? What about Aurora, Redshit, and EMR competing directly with Oracle and SQL Server? Or, their replacement of a number of web application servers? Seems lik
72.
by lstroud 10y ago
I believe there was a supreme court ruling on nuisance laws....can't put my fingers on it at the moment. However, my recollection is that, as applied to noise, expect decibels had to be defined in the law for it to be legal. I assume
73.
by lstroud 10y ago
Simply, current definition "fake news" == propaganda
74.
by lstroud 10y ago
When will people understand that the internet has been legally deemed public. What you say will be in the public and won't go away. You have a right to say what you want, but don't expect people to ignore your words.
75.
by lstroud 10y ago
Seems like an air burst scatter shot weapon would be more effective. Something like a shotgun with explosive projectiles. Use the concussive blow to cause damage.
76.
by lstroud 10y ago
Got him to admit to me that he exaggerates for "effect" in the talk. Personally, I see "exaggerating for effect" as dishonest. Manipulating facts in order to generate a response is manipulation.
77.
by lstroud 10y ago
I haven't read the book, but this seems like the classic case of a solution looking for a problem.
78.
by lstroud 10y ago
Misleading headline
79.
by lstroud 10y ago
They allowed politics to interfere with progress and ran off Brendan Eich.
80.
by lstroud 10y ago
Selective outrage. Where has this been when scientists were quoting pharmaceutical jobs because they were being asked to omit facts?
81.
by lstroud 10y ago
What if something like a QOS tag were established for the page author to declare their need for a higher priority? The browser would also need to display an icon on tabs that have requested higher priority so that users can close sites that
82.
by lstroud 10y ago
Politically, you would have to need guarantees against double dipping (constitutional amendment outlawing all other forms of distribution - welfare, food stamps). That's the problem with all the ideas like this...maybe they would be be
83.
by lstroud 10y ago
Has anyone been able to validate or correlate the claims in this article? It's an opinion piece without a lot of verifiable references or data. Seems like it is, to some degree, describing itself.
84.
by lstroud 10y ago
Probably wouldn't be a horrible thing to be able to add to your will instructions to release data if possible.
85.
by lstroud 10y ago
I hope this means that the didn't feel they had the legal expertise to get through the regulatory controls. Hopefully this is not related to legal issues around responsibility for accidents, insurance, etc.
86.
by lstroud 10y ago
Didn't the CIA provide the evidence that Benghazi was caused by protests over a video? Or, was that fabrication purely the administration's work?
87.
by lstroud 10y ago
Has anyone seen anything resembling a fact or evidence in all of this? It wouldn't shock me, given the poor state of the political party's email security, if the emails had been retrieved by multiple entities. I haven't seen
88.
by lstroud 10y ago
Article takes political positions as axioms for the goals of an economy. This makes it hard to say much other than they agree with themselves. Lots of straw men running around.
89.
by lstroud 10y ago
Irony...advocating discrimination against Trump supporters because you believe they advocate discrimination.
90.
by lstroud 10y ago
Seems like it boils down to determining who gets to make tax law in the EU. Is the EU able to levy taxes on citizens of their member nations directly? Or, are the nations themselves responsible? I'm not sure the legal structure of the

More ›