lolakutty

5 ms·

91.
by lolakutty 1mo ago
>focus on the design Can you explain what you mean by this? Do you evaluate the design without reviewing the generated code?
92.
by lolakutty 1mo ago
>How would artisanal software even distinguish itself. artisanal software is software that has a bound on the complexity. A human has to reason about it.
93.
by lolakutty 1mo ago
Building with AI does not interest me. Someone please tell me where the fun in that is?
94.
by lolakutty 1mo ago
LLMs + Economics = perpetual slop. No new ideas, no new art. Nothing worth living for (Remembering quote from Dead Poets Society). Perpetual grotesque rehash of the past greatness... At this point humanity is destroyed.
95.
by lolakutty 1mo ago
90s highschool hobby programmer here. I see LLMs as what it is. Not a bit more, not a bit less.
96.
by lolakutty 1mo ago
The goalposts didn't move, they just got refined and more specified..
97.
by lolakutty 1mo ago
Pattern matching is like that. It can map a full sentence to its meaning, without ability to map one of the words in the sentence to its meaning...
98.
by lolakutty 1mo ago
If you search randomness, you ll get any behavior that you can imagine. That does not mean that the tool is NOT doing a search. In the case of LLMs, it is not searching the whole of the randomness, but instead it just search among the gramm
99.
by lolakutty 1mo ago
If A -> B and B -> C are within human knowledge, then I don't really consider that A -> C to be outside of human knowledge. Sure, LLMs are very good at discovering hidden links. But that is about it. And don't get me wron
100.
by lolakutty 1mo ago
Where exactly do I need "coming around" based on what I said here?
101.
by lolakutty 1mo ago
It seems that we all are assuming LLMs will grow arbitrary capabilities to manifest our fantasies, given enough $$$.... Great for milking the investors to the last drop...
102.
by lolakutty 1mo ago
Synthetic data can only help the model to capture existing patterns in the current training data more efficiently . So it can improve the performance upto certain point, but not beyond it. >they can collect their own data with robots...
103.
by lolakutty 1mo ago
>You can basically do the same thing again with the improved model, and get an even better one... It does not make much of a difference if the "performance" is limited by the training data.
104.
by lolakutty 1mo ago
>The reason AI is not a normal technology is because it is fully general. It is fully "general", because its training data encompass all human knowledge. It is a matter of scaling, rather than a matter of method. And so it is o
105.
by lolakutty 1mo ago
Why?
106.
by lolakutty 1mo ago
Sure, but it is a token predictor, and it is not intelligent not because it works by predicting a token, but it shows dumb behavior... LLMs are a great search tool. It searches connections in the collective human knowledge that humans have
107.
by lolakutty 1mo ago
Those cries are the corrective reaction to cries of "We are Artificial super GI now!" And yes, it is just a next token predictor.
108.
by lolakutty 1mo ago
When the creator has spent a day to create it, chances are that they are going to abandon it just as fast. Why spend time to learn something like that?
109.
by lolakutty 1mo ago
normie: Loves to walk on technologically advanced crutches when they have perfectly working legs...
110.
by lolakutty 1mo ago
Sorry. I don't agree that it "create" views autonomously. A human has to create a view in a database. In the case of LLM, a human has to create a "prompt" that the LLM just continue, based on the patterns humans ha
111.
by lolakutty 1mo ago
At least the tools they used to use used to be so...Now the tools do this https://blog.coredump.cx/p/recursion-into-madness
112.
by lolakutty 1mo ago
> LLM generated This is a proxy for "the author didn't give a shit"..Not always, but often.
113.
by lolakutty 1mo ago
Internet and 24x7 connectivity is like humanity collectively having a seizure.
114.
by lolakutty 1mo ago
Yes, it is a very efficient search tool for existing data..
115.
by lolakutty 1mo ago
I never left, because I knew for a fact that this, what you describe, would be the ultimate eventuality.
116.
by lolakutty 1mo ago
Of course, this is what the end of Men in Black shows. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OKnpPCQyUec But let me tell you another possibility. What if there is no nature, but just our perception of it. Yea, tree falling in the
117.
by lolakutty 1mo ago
I would think in any domain that used to suffer due to lack of a fuzzy, search. In cases where LLMs are used to generate stuff, when push comes to shove, LLMs fails to deliver. This is fundamental. For example, if you talk to an LLM regardi
118.
by lolakutty 1mo ago
Yea, it is a better search tool than humans, as computers always were....
119.
by lolakutty 1mo ago
Everyone who's ideas made bulldozer possible, I would say..
120.
by lolakutty 1mo ago
>creative or original thought. If this can only answer questions, then it fails this test. Because at least the question has to come from somewhere...

More ›