lolakutty

6 ms·

121.
by lolakutty 1mo ago
>entirety of current human achivement.. The right way to look at it is that LLMs help us to maximize the utility of the entirety of current human achievement/knowledge by discovering obscure connections in it.
122.
by lolakutty 1mo ago
>Meat brains have a magical ability to manifest original ideas.. No, no. Any random sentence generator can generate original idea. Actually it is said that randomness contain all the answers. You don't need a "meat brain"
123.
by lolakutty 1mo ago
Are people paid to write this shite?
124.
by lolakutty 1mo ago
>More people showed up just to argue, rather than to have curious conversations. What is the difference? Just curious...
125.
by lolakutty 1mo ago
Yea, it is easier to use an LLM for search than using a conventional search engine. No one is going back to that if a non-malicious LLM is available at reasonable costs.
126.
by lolakutty 1mo ago
>I can close an eye on using LLMs for research only. Yes, this is the only way I use them. As a better search tool for the collective knowledge, and to do arbitrary queries on a complicated code base. If there are any mechanical changes,
127.
by lolakutty 1mo ago
>Then it already knows how that made the proof work.. I think you cannot assume so, because pattern matching is not reasoning.
128.
by lolakutty 1mo ago
Yea, strongly agree. I think this is going to back-fire spectacularly. They better start preparing an apology...
129.
by lolakutty 1mo ago
Who should get credit? All the humans who ever worked to create the data. And the AI company for making the search program that searched through the data and found the solution.
130.
by lolakutty 1mo ago
It seems that humanity would have went on a lot longer if we never left the caves, so you might have a point there.