lolakutty

3 ms·

31.
by lolakutty 5d ago
>But that tells you nothing about what's going on on the inside It does not have to tell us anything. Because we built it..We know what is going on the inside. There is nothing more to it..
32.
by lolakutty 5d ago
Isn't that what I just said?
33.
by lolakutty 5d ago
I care about other things. Like my amusement that I get when I see the AI praising accounts go silent once they are pushed a bit...
34.
by lolakutty 5d ago
Don't answer then...its as simple as that... They can LLM themselves to complete lock in for all I care...
35.
by lolakutty 5d ago
Yea, we use language to think, and this limitation hinders with the forming of such thoughts....
36.
by lolakutty 5d ago
> The two parties just record the details of the trade on a piece of paper and settle up later.... I think this "paper" would precede the use of stones. When the villagers are tired of bartering, they are not going to magically
37.
by lolakutty 5d ago
>AI is useful This is not a binary thing. It could be useful at the same time detrimental in some manner. Look at smartphones. I am just raising the possibilities if one use LLMs indiscriminately to generate code.
38.
by lolakutty 5d ago
So a systems using money is just barter system where one commodity is overwhelmingly involved?
39.
by lolakutty 6d ago
There is no headset! No hay banda! and yet we hear a band..
40.
by lolakutty 6d ago
Put on a VR headset and tell me where the buttons you see are? Space is felt and so is time . Both are sensations that consciousness feels.
41.
by lolakutty 6d ago
Jackpot!
42.
by lolakutty 6d ago
Space and time are illusions. So probably true in some sense...There is probably no electron at all...I mean, one would be quite arbitrary, why not two?
43.
by lolakutty 6d ago
If you clarify your line of reasoning, I can try to address it. Because frankly, I can't follow it... But it seems that your arguments is that "a bunch of guys got sold on the idea, so it must be legit"...is that it?
44.
by lolakutty 6d ago
>into solving Navier Stokes problem haha yeah. Never said LLMs are not capable of some things...May be try to comprehend, before you respond.
45.
by lolakutty 6d ago
The truth probably is that someone looked at what LLM can do, understood its real potential (really, it is a fantastic search tools for existing knowledge), and then went a bit further and understood its potential as a scam (ie market it as
46.
by lolakutty 6d ago
Can you tell me what the most complex thing (software) that you have yourself implemented is?
47.
by lolakutty 6d ago
This is my very first account...
48.
by lolakutty 6d ago
> I review the code... If this is true, then you are not saving a lot of time. Because most of the time is spent evaluating various options and ways to implement the functionality. Even when you are reviewing, you ll have to do that. (Wi
49.
by lolakutty 6d ago
take a look at my comments and tell me if you feel like I am a bot...
50.
by lolakutty 6d ago
>most of the time there are few issues to correct. Kindly share the metrics by which you evaluate the changes.
51.
by lolakutty 6d ago
> implement standard SWE best practices The thing is, if you follow SWE best practices indiscriminately, then you ll have a shit code base in no time. There is no silver bullet, and no replacement for experience and mindfulness.
52.
by lolakutty 8d ago
>but also atoms.. So like every other machine. Got it...
53.
by lolakutty 8d ago
> His point is that in cosmology, that 'standard part of the scientific toolkit' isn't being used. Yea, that is what I was trying to say in the comment above ...
54.
by lolakutty 8d ago
>but it needs the right architecture. Architecture it key. Can you make EM radiation with an LLM with right Architecture? If not why do people say things like this?
55.
by lolakutty 8d ago
I...don't think that is universally true.
56.
by lolakutty 8d ago
Aren't laymen allowed to wonder about these things and share their thoughts? You should remember that the groundwork on which all the scientific pursuits stands on was built by curious laymen ...Today it seems that without a Phd (appar
57.
by lolakutty 9d ago
>it broke away and hacked Huggin Face.. More like it autogenerated some text that caused a harness to do bad stuff.
58.
by lolakutty 9d ago
> involve your proprietary workflow. Until the next model update...
59.
by lolakutty 9d ago
I meant no such thing about your customers.
60.
by lolakutty 9d ago
>There is no logical reason why the second method should be possible at all, One reason I can think of is if we consider that some regularity in the physical behavior is required for consciousness to evolve and so consciousness only form

More ›