lilyball

71 ms·

871.
by lilyball 7y ago
Not particularly relevant here; the for-in loop here was operating on the `env` object, which holds all the keys directly. The prototype access was via the expression `options.env`, not the for loop.
872.
by lilyball 7y ago
I'd love to see a diagram type that produces Git commit graphs (either top-to-bottom or left-to-right).
873.
by lilyball 7y ago
expect is used to run a bunch of interactive tests for the fish shell ( https://github.com/fish-shell/fish-shell/tree/master/tests , all of the files ending in .expect, where the file interactive.expect.rc
874.
by lilyball 7y ago
Yes you can. You can choose to skip a particular lecture if it's covering particularly triggering topics. If the lecture is particularly important, you can approach the professor about dealing with the lecture content in a more sensiti
875.
by lilyball 7y ago
People who can be expected to experience increased distress from the topic are much more likely to choose to avoid it, so I'm not surprised in the least by that association. Also from the article: > critics argue that the avoidance
876.
by lilyball 7y ago
Yeah, that's because they had to watch the content anyway. Trigger warnings allow people to avoid triggering content, or to delay consuming the content until they're in a better frame of mind. If you say "This content has X,
877.
by lilyball 7y ago
I'm encouraged by the GraphQL support with docs, except there appears to be no way to provide headers (such as Authorization), which means I can't even fetch my schema.
878.
by lilyball 7y ago
Is there any particular reason why functions and blocks had arity restrictions until now?
879.
by lilyball 7y ago
What Slack really should do is have a WYSIWYG editor that keeps the markdown syntax . Just apply rich text formatting to the markdown syntax, but otherwise leave the text alone. This will provide a nice reminder about what the syntax does
880.
by lilyball 7y ago
Headers really shouldn’t be affecting each other. Header order shouldn’t matter. The fact that it does is arguably a bad design flaw in C/C++, although the C modules system pushed by Apple fixed this.
881.
by lilyball 7y ago
> Most people familiar with the situation are attributing the problem to a Roku, in that it's the Roku devices that are malfunctioning and not the Nintendo Switch. I would certainly hope that "entering an endless boot loop&qu
882.
by lilyball 7y ago
Agreed, especially because this new code may have unintended consequences. For example, if the heap grows extremely fast in that 500ms sleep time then it can get dramatically larger than you'd like, when instead we want to run a GC rig
883.
by lilyball 7y ago
Why is a 17lb cat ok in the passenger area but not a 22lb cat?
884.
by lilyball 7y ago
It's clearly not about space. Old SSH keys are a security hazard. Even moreso keys you aren't using anymore and therefore may not be particularly careful with. Heck, even in this very scenario, if I haven't used an SSH key wi
885.
by lilyball 7y ago
As long as they're actively using it, I don't see the problem. If someone is squatting on a domain without using it, that's a different problem and should be handled in a way that doesn't punish legitimate users.
886.
by lilyball 7y ago
So? Should only people who can afford high costs be allowed to own three-letter domains? Worthiness is not defined by income.
887.
by lilyball 7y ago
Not just Swift 5.1, but they also require iOS 13 because there's a rather unfortunate stdlib dependency. Technically they only need the dependency when crossing module boundaries, but they're restricting the feature completely any
888.
by lilyball 7y ago
Why should they support holding onto SSH keys forever in case you forgot to write down your backup 2FA codes, especially when they've never advertised that they'll accept SSH key-signed artifacts as proof of identity?
889.
by lilyball 7y ago
The "butterfly mechanism" keyboards never bothered me. I actually like the feel of my MBP's keyboard. Likewise the software Escape key never bothered me. But honestly, the design of the arrow keys is super important. With the
890.
by lilyball 7y ago
Good question. https://github.com/byuu/bsnes/blob/bd8e94a7c7cbfdf7ac0b7f24c... suggests there are reasons why the section(text) approach might not work, and https://github.com/byuu/bsnes&
891.
by lilyball 7y ago
Indie hackers may not be a sustainable market, but on the other hand, employees using your tool for hobby projects is a great way to backdoor yourself into the company. If you're going to start at a $49/mo plan, you may want to sp
892.
by lilyball 7y ago
I'm a woman and the income earner in my family. My Apple Card credit limit is significantly lower than my other cards. Anecdotal, but it certainly doesn't seem like being the income earner matters.
893.
by lilyball 7y ago
> No programmatic reason what given for why a string solution couldnt be used, only an arbitrary reason The entire problem is arbitrary. It's not a real-world problem looking for a solution. It's a programming exercise.
894.
by lilyball 7y ago
And the point is that anyone with even a modicum of dev experience can remove the `subform` field and automate submission to the otherwise-standard form and completely bypass ReCAPTCHA.
895.
by lilyball 7y ago
> If it wasn't possible to craft cross-site HEAD (which devs use in real life like.. never?) the bug would stop right there. You're still focusing on the wrong thing. HEAD requests are largely obsolete at this point, yes, but
896.
by lilyball 7y ago
If GET is considered safe, HEAD must be as well. It's complete nonsense to claim HEAD is dangerous while GET is safe. Semantically, HEAD is literally just "do a GET but don't give me the body", so it should have the exac
897.
by lilyball 7y ago
If you have a set number of possible view types you could in theory have it hold onto an enum of the different types.
898.
by lilyball 7y ago
I assume your goal with [0] is to be able to say `ViewContainer()` and have it wrap an `EmptyView`? You can do that like the following: class ViewContainer<ViewType: View> { var view: ViewType init(view: ViewType) {
899.
by lilyball 7y ago
I haven't really dug into SwiftUI yet, but I'm not quite sure what you're describing. I'd love to see a concrete example of something you think you can't replicate with your own type.
900.
by lilyball 7y ago
> the seemingly secret Swift magic that's used to implement some features What magic are we talking about? I thought all the new stuff was RFC'd right after SwiftUI was announced.

More ›