8 ms·

Yes you can. You can choose to skip a particular lecture if it's covering particularly triggering topics. If the lecture is particularly important, you can appr

Yes you can. You can choose to skip a particular lecture if it's covering particularly triggering topics. If the lecture is particularly important, you can approach the professor about dealing with the lecture content in a more sensitive one-on-one context, or see if the lecture is recorded such that you can watch it later when you have more mental spoons to deal with it. > it limits the teacher's options because suddenly material that is meant to capitalize on surprise elements becomes a liability since it's unvetted Teachers should not be making their students uncomfortable (let alone triggering trauma) by surprise. This is a consent issue.

2804t3qwp 7y ago
Why is this a consent issue? Lots of intro to sociology classes do a lesson on the Nacirema, race and violence are massive components of studying mid 20th century literature, and plenty of other fields of study have lessons that are meant to convey an emotional context and not just an informational one and they do this often with surprise elements. Labeling that as traumatic and non-consensual glosses over the part where the main people who seem to be reporting trauma from these lessons are people who already had trauma and are clearly still influenced heavily by it or they wouldn't need trigger warnings. Calling it a consent issue frankly is just a dog whistle. And if skipping the lecture is a valid choice for learning then why does the professor need to be contacted afterwards? The professor already selected the information they felt was relevant and presented it in the fashion they felt was the most useful to the class. Your viewpoint only seems to make sense if the default assumption is that emotional information isn't a priority for the instructor but that doesn't jive with how a large swathe of the humanities and social sciences are often taught.
- watwut 7y ago
  > And if skipping the lecture is a valid choice for learning then why does the professor need to be contacted afterwards? Reality check: so that you distinguish yourself from the slackers who did not came, because they did not felt like going. And there are always those. Second, it is contra argument against "will not learn something important" argument. Visit teacher during open hours to learn that important thing. In all likelyhood, there is no massive thing to catch up with. Typically these are materials that are mean to make the issue of violence and rape less academic to students - seeing bodies makes it more real then reading about bodies. It is mostly emotional impact that is avoided. Even if emotional impact is priority, emotional impact on person we are talking about is different then emotional impact on me. The material works completely differvently way for them. Typically, the violent material is shown to students so that they break naive bubbles of how easy it is. People we talk about knows about it more then a student after seeing it.

2804t3qwp 7y ago

Why is this a consent issue? Lots of intro to sociology classes do a lesson on the Nacirema, race and violence are massive components of studying mid 20th century literature, and plenty of other fields of study have lessons that are meant to convey an emotional context and not just an informational one and they do this often with surprise elements. Labeling that as traumatic and non-consensual glosses over the part where the main people who seem to be reporting trauma from these lessons are people who already had trauma and are clearly still influenced heavily by it or they wouldn't need trigger warnings. Calling it a consent issue frankly is just a dog whistle. And if skipping the lecture is a valid choice for learning then why does the professor need to be contacted afterwards? The professor already selected the information they felt was relevant and presented it in the fashion they felt was the most useful to the class. Your viewpoint only seems to make sense if the default assumption is that emotional information isn't a priority for the instructor but that doesn't jive with how a large swathe of the humanities and social sciences are often taught.

watwut 7y ago
> And if skipping the lecture is a valid choice for learning then why does the professor need to be contacted afterwards? Reality check: so that you distinguish yourself from the slackers who did not came, because they did not felt like going. And there are always those. Second, it is contra argument against "will not learn something important" argument. Visit teacher during open hours to learn that important thing. In all likelyhood, there is no massive thing to catch up with. Typically these are materials that are mean to make the issue of violence and rape less academic to students - seeing bodies makes it more real then reading about bodies. It is mostly emotional impact that is avoided. Even if emotional impact is priority, emotional impact on person we are talking about is different then emotional impact on me. The material works completely differvently way for them. Typically, the violent material is shown to students so that they break naive bubbles of how easy it is. People we talk about knows about it more then a student after seeing it.