life_on_mars

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by life_on_mars 10y ago

   Has this other evidence even been presented yet? edit: given that even a simple question was downvoted, I can only conclude that there are likely a lot of Google employees downvoting anything that doesn't support Google's side in
2. 2.▲
   by life_on_mars 10y ago

   It's reasonable for it to be used against Mr Lewandowsky, but is it reasonable to use it against his employer? Many people have their opinion on whether Uber is evil or not, but any employer that forces you to give up a right that Cons
3. 3.▲
   by life_on_mars 10y ago

   They claim that they knew this happened more than a year ago. The veracity of their logs, or at the very least the chain of custody of those logs, should seriously be called into question at this point. They should have litigated against Mr
4. 4.▲
   by life_on_mars 10y ago

   So from what I understand, Google is litigating this in public, but their lawyers, such as Mr. Verhoeven, are redacting everything on their side they don't want public. This makes it sound like Google is doing this in public mainly to
5. 5.▲
   by life_on_mars 10y ago

   It's an absurd position to take. Maybe he picked his lawyers based on quality of the lawyers he'd be facing. I've met some of Google's lawyers, and if I were being sued by them, I'd get the best damn lawyers my mone