lewhoo

11 ms·

91.
by lewhoo 3y ago
I don't think it's so simple. Support for fascism can seem sensible and logical if you let yourself think that between you and greatness stands a minority whose sole purpose is to prevent you from becoming great. You could argue i
92.
by lewhoo 3y ago
Distribute the means of production.
93.
by lewhoo 3y ago
> It does give rights to prevent a reproduction, but that is not what an AI model does. Why would you conclude that ? While an AI model does not ONLY reproduce, it most certainly can make verbatim reproductions. The things preventing the
94.
by lewhoo 3y ago
GPT is so good at leetcode you don't even have to paste the problem, just ask for an answer to leetcode [problem number].
95.
by lewhoo 3y ago
Well, I don't know about that. I strongly suspect chatgpt could deliver whole copyrighted books piece by piece. I suspect that because it most certainly can do that with non-copyrighted text. Just ask it to give you something out of th
96.
by lewhoo 3y ago
> Any novice can beat you when assisted by an engine. A novice wouldn't be assisted by the engine but rather be an engine-chessboard interface with no real input as far as the game goes. I think that's a really weird take. Yo
97.
by lewhoo 3y ago
A far better analogy would be a self-driving car coerced into a crash. I wouldn't say it's pointless. I'd be pretty angry if I parental-locked everything only to find out that clever children found a way.
98.
by lewhoo 3y ago
Given that Sutskever once described his idea of AGI-human relationship to be like that of CEO-board (how ironic) I suspect there aren't really any good guys here. There might only be good intentions.
99.
by lewhoo 3y ago
Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds. Apocalypse proclamations aren't just a thing to throw around. Other people made great tech before indeed, but I hope we're not comparing AGI to the next Iphone. There were times in
100.
by lewhoo 3y ago
FWIW, that's called zealotry and people do a lot of dramatic, disruptive things in the name of it. That would be a really bad take on climate change.
101.
by lewhoo 3y ago
I think only a minority of the general public truly cares about AI Safety That doesn't matter that much. If your analysis is correct then it means a (tiny) minority of OpenAI cares about AI safety. I hope this isn't the case.
102.
by lewhoo 3y ago
I don't think this is entirely true. There are degrees to AI safety dependent on what we input as AI in the equation. You typically don't hear alarm bells when AlphaFold is discussed. LLM's indeed may produce harmful content
103.
by lewhoo 3y ago
Have humans been ready for anything? Like controlling nuclear arsenal? The Manhattan project urged Truman in a letter not to use the atomic bomb. There were also ideas of inviting Japanese delegacy to see the nuclear tests for themselves.
104.
by lewhoo 3y ago
Really? Why is that? Because of disputes which has been there since humans first uttered a sound? Precisely.
105.
by lewhoo 3y ago
The answers may or may not have any sense depending whether or not you find something in us not worth automating at all. Is there such a thing ?
106.
by lewhoo 3y ago
What I'm getting from all of this is the hype of AGI right around the corner got a bit exposed. I may be reading to much into it but if it were true then given an opportunity to be part of it you take it and put aside things that shoul
107.
by lewhoo 3y ago
Yeah but the question remains are they passing because of a new obtained/emerged quality or are they passing because they were taught specifically to how to pass or is there even a difference at this point.
108.
by lewhoo 3y ago
A good argument for independent regulation/oversight.
109.
by lewhoo 3y ago
reach a truce where the board would resign and he and Brockman would return That's a funny use of the word truce.
110.
by lewhoo 3y ago
With an important distinction. No previous generation (obviously) tried to decide that we're done and it's the apes' turn now. I don't know if AGI is a near possibility or not, but if it is then it won't be our chil
111.
by lewhoo 3y ago
Come weary Sam and share your AI anxiety with the rest of us.
112.
by lewhoo 3y ago
That's weird to read. Interpolations of various sorts are known and solved and should probably be digested by chatgpt in training by the bulk. I'm not doubting your effort by any means, I'm just saying this sounds like one of
113.
by lewhoo 3y ago
If artists collectively notice (and can prove) a decrease of value of their work then I'd wager fair use is definitely broken, particularly: 4. the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
114.
by lewhoo 3y ago
There might be a market for something like a CEOblocker for browsers.
115.
by lewhoo 3y ago
Maybe not illegal but optional (opt in not opt out). More issues are of course at hand but strong privacy should be a step in the right direction regardless. Let's not forsake traffic violations just because there are killers on the lo
116.
by lewhoo 3y ago
I agree but this is too general. If something bad gets into AI (like very biased or false training data) that has unfortunate effects also stands.
117.
by lewhoo 3y ago
There is: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Enviropig or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AquAdvantage_salmon or things to the likes of https://www.avma.org/news/genetically-modifi
118.
by lewhoo 3y ago
I'm no expert but I actually think we are pretty good at genetically modifying organisms and that manifests itself in crops for instance with enough research to support the benefits.
119.
by lewhoo 3y ago
I don't know about that. Cloning/modifying humans has potentially so much benefit and yet we seem to stack hypotheses on top of it and conclude it's not worth it. There is also a lot to be said about all the hypotheses of kil
120.
by lewhoo 3y ago
That might be true but there's no way of knowing for sure. Planet wide gulag system(a colorful and a bit wrong name for prisons) already exists and is pretty aligned on topics like killing fellow humans as a result of conscious, delibe

More ›