lesuorac

21 ms·

421.
by lesuorac 1y ago
Homelessness + loans (credit cards) are on the rise and births are on the decrease. But to honestly answer the question, by either not living in large cities and commuting in, sharing those 3BRs, or staying home with parents. Shaving that 4
422.
by lesuorac 1y ago
I'm kind of surprised this is legal. Just using an internet feed as a workaround to not having a work permit just seems like easy fruit. These workers wouldn't be allowed to do that role in-person, why are they allowed to do it re
423.
by lesuorac 1y ago
Are you counting eurozone as 2011? I think it counts enough as American if it caused a downgrade in the USG's credit rating. [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/August_2011_stock_markets_fall
424.
by lesuorac 1y ago
The US isn't slowing China anymore. China has an import ban on chips [1] so its irrelevant what the US does. [1]: https://www.cnbc.com/2025/09/17/nvidia-ceo-disappointed-afte...
425.
by lesuorac 1y ago
They survived the dot-com bubble, I don't see the AI bubble taking out Amazon. It might take out your 401k for a decade.
426.
by lesuorac 1y ago
While I am more of the belief that these people are wanting a time with less income equality and conflating that with factory work. There's going to be a bunch of people wanting any job [1] and more in the coming years. So they'd
427.
by lesuorac 1y ago
High margin companies are always looking to cut the lower-margin parts of their business regardless of if they're profitable. The general idea being that you'll losing money due to opportunity cost. Personally, I think you're
428.
by lesuorac 1y ago
> Let people vote with their money I feel like I only hear this argument after people voted with their vote and somebody doesn't like the result. That said, not really opposed to continuous raising of ICE / gas tax until it&#x2
429.
by lesuorac 1y ago
Thanks, I'll go short gold now since it's going to go down! Things being priced in is such horse shit. Momentum trading works specifically because the market fails to price in information.
430.
by lesuorac 1y ago
Which law allows the death penalty for allegedly transporting drugs? Shooting first and asking questions later is how we got into this mess of deporting us citizens.
431.
by lesuorac 1y ago
> were still enforced This sounds like its doing a lot of heavy lifting. A bunch of state abortion bans were no longer enforced until they were. If it's still on the books then it counts as a "crazy law"; if you don't
432.
by lesuorac 1y ago
> For me personally, I feel like advertising is directly at odds with quality journalism. I think we've seen so many useless ads that this is effectively true but it really doesn't need to be. Think about say Golf magazine. Is
433.
by lesuorac 1y ago
I mean the Jones act was pretty practical for it's time. When you could obtain a ship via a cheap lease from the US Navy then the lack of capital spend building the ship is fine to spend employing US sailors. However, now that the navy
434.
by lesuorac 1y ago
Afaik, format shifting for convince is legal so long as you're Anthropic. It was mostly a passing mention in the lawsuit against them where the damages are just for pirating books they didn't also buy. The fact that they bought us
435.
by lesuorac 1y ago
Can't you stick about anything heavy to use as munitions for a cannon?
436.
by lesuorac 1y ago
The problem is that no other government agency is capable of doing this. That's why all the covid stimulus checks were done via the IRS and the PPP loans were done through commercial banks.
437.
by lesuorac 1y ago
The IRS does it anyways to validate your return ... It's marginally more work for them to tell you the results of their math. And compared to how many people file taxes it's a net benefit for society. Collectively paying a small g
438.
by lesuorac 1y ago
The way that worked is that part of the CHIPs act after Intel reached a milestone the USG handed them a bag of cash. Intel failed at finishing a bunch of milestones so there was a large pot of money Intel did not get. Trump gave them that p
439.
by lesuorac 1y ago
It sounds like if you put down less than 20% that part is insured by somebody else so the government doesn't need to re-coup the full 100% to be even as they can get 10+% from somebody else. https://en.wikipedia.org/wik
440.
by lesuorac 1y ago
Hey now, my ancestors came over in the 1700s and there were pretty skilled!
441.
by lesuorac 1y ago
Ok, but then he's appointed Prime Minister as well as elected to President and nothing changes? Like the current congress could impeach him whenever they wanted. The fact that they don't (and voted for BBB) is enough proof to me t
442.
by lesuorac 1y ago
Then layoff a singular individual with severance instead of firing them lol... (although legally "firing" vs "layoff" is irrelevant, depending on the situation you can get benefits despite being what a layperson consider
443.
by lesuorac 1y ago
I think the main pro is that you can't have these arguments of the president being hamstrung by congress. There's a very common trend of a president campaigning on something and then never delivering as president. I don't thi
444.
by lesuorac 1y ago
> 1. Browser fingerprinting or ip bans. They used advanced fingerprint-shifting browsers and residential proxy ips. Don't you typically use that for valid users? As-in, you allow access when the fingerpint matches their existing fin
445.
by lesuorac 1y ago
Which is why severance payments in fang are tied to not suing the company. If that works when you lay of 10% of the company why doesn't it work when you want to fire 1 individual? You can definitely argue it's not fair to pay some
446.
by lesuorac 1y ago
Eh? Surely it's better to cite the authority's reasons as to why they think this way than just to cite the authority itself ... It's not like there's a lack of times he's talked about rust. Just link his commentary
447.
by lesuorac 1y ago
> may get disbarred Doesn't this prove your post as wrong? You're not sure that this will get disbarred presumably because you haven't seen somebody get disbarred over it despite it occurring for years. The problem with el
448.
by lesuorac 1y ago
> After obtaining the bitcoins, are they forced to sell it immediately? How does this affect the market? Other way around, by executive order they're forced to hold it in a sovereign wealth fund.
449.
by lesuorac 1y ago
If it's a single stock portfolio yeah. If it's like 1000 different stocks then stick that information into an appendix and only use the current market value in the write-up. It's like confiscating a Ferrari and saying you too
450.
by lesuorac 1y ago
I assume it's technology driven. The effect is probably expensive to produce so phones with weaker performance can't do it.

More ›