legolas2412

13 ms·

91.
by legolas2412 5y ago
Yeah. And then two people hijacked a plane to free Indira gandhi. This is the definition of terrorism as it is using violence for political purposes. Congress have those two party tickets and backed them in elections. https://en.
92.
by legolas2412 5y ago
It would have been better if reinfection was described as "you'll test positive again, but it will be milder". Instead the media was full of articles saying "immunity lasts only 6 months"
93.
by legolas2412 5y ago
India has been a secular state for 70 years, and it is not becoming Islamic. We can stay secular or become a Hindu theocratic state. Becoming an Islamic theocratic state is not at all a possibility. If you really think there's a chance
94.
by legolas2412 5y ago
I don't agree with any of the posters in this thread advocating that India become a Hindu state. But your viewpoint is also troubling for me. Do you not think there is an undercurrent of theocracy in Islam? Do you think that there is n
95.
by legolas2412 5y ago
Is that bias/unfair advantage? Most indians working in FAANG in USA tend to be immigrants. So comparing them to their share of population is ridiculous. Even if you limit yourselves to second generation indian American, they are not th
96.
by legolas2412 5y ago
Hmm,i wonder why i as a non immigrant don't qualify for this citizenship even after paying all taxes, including FICA
97.
by legolas2412 5y ago
I don't think so. It seems to me that are policies are very clearly targeted to tax income earners, not capital owners.
98.
by legolas2412 5y ago
If that is your understanding of the phrase "basic functionality for level 5", can GM announce that they are installing two cameras in each car and now they have basic functionality for level 5? If basic functionality does not nee
99.
by legolas2412 5y ago
"Basic functionality for level five isn't level five." I'm surprised you say this totally seriously. For me this means that level 5 will be this year, and then there might be extra new cool features, which are not necess
100.
by legolas2412 5y ago
Hell, it needs to be better than you with a "train is coming, I'm going to slow down" driver assistance. If you tell me that no such driver assistance exists, just apply it to scenarios where it exists, like lane keep assists
101.
by legolas2412 5y ago
This video from 2016 ( https://www.tesla.com/videos/autopilot-self-driving-hardware... ) saying "the driver is there just for legal reasons, the car is driving itself" This page ( https://www.tesla.co
102.
by legolas2412 5y ago
This video from 2016 ( https://www.tesla.com/videos/autopilot-self-driving-hardware... ) saying "the driver is there just for legal reasons, the car is driving itself" This page ( https://www.tesla.co
103.
by legolas2412 5y ago
Theae stats are often quoted by Musk and Tesla to suggest that driverless cars are here and safer than human drivers, and the only thing preventing them are regulators. They are never quoted to imply that driver assistance makes driving saf
104.
by legolas2412 5y ago
Only one car manufacturer's CEO and fanboys speak about how technologically advanced it is and how driverless cars have been here since 2016.
105.
by legolas2412 5y ago
There's no mixed messaging? The driver is there just for regulatory purposes, all cars self driving in 2016!, cross country summon in 2017, coast to coast autonomous drive in 2018, Tesla self driving taxis in 2019, FSD making teslas wo
106.
by legolas2412 5y ago
Your last paragraph is the most important one. Autopilot is driver assistance, and it shouldn't be a surprise that it helps. But these results are comparing human + computer vs human, and does not in anyway indicate that the computer a
107.
by legolas2412 5y ago
The value of Bitcoin is not just the blockchain. It is the distributed consensus on it being the correct blockchain. So, Bitcoin relies on others believing that this version of the blockchain is authoritative. Nothing like this in gold. It
108.
by legolas2412 6y ago
Can you show instances where congress (INC) was censored?
109.
by legolas2412 6y ago
> How would you know if it's gross negligence or an accident? That's a different question from "what difference does it make" > What consequences are you thinking of that we haven't already done? Sanctions, tr
110.
by legolas2412 6y ago
That's my point. Labor doesn't have equal rights as capital
111.
by legolas2412 6y ago
I as an individual add value to society. I generally become profitable by providing other people a better alternative labor/services than competing humans. Can I also get zero income tax rate? Can I also get the freedom of movement to
112.
by legolas2412 6y ago
They are suggesting that the treaty has a loophole that companies can make shell companies to outsource profit to non-signatory tax havens. Of course, that is stupid. That loophole is what happens now, and the point of such a treaty would b
113.
by legolas2412 6y ago
Not that it's happening, but would it be a bad thing?
114.
by legolas2412 6y ago
So many things to unpack here. Please keep in mind that Tesla and Musk are masters of misrepresenting statistics out of context. So, when you said that "Tesla cars" kill humans at a lower rate than "human drivers", could
115.
by legolas2412 6y ago
> Corporate landlords won't be able to lobby quite so fiercely against new construction, upzoning and rent controls. This sounds like a good thing to me. Why will it turn out badly?
116.
by legolas2412 6y ago
I've seen this argument, but i never understand the people making this argument. China is called the factory of the world, and it is undeniable that a lot of chinese labor force works in manufacturing. So if jobs weren't lost due
117.
by legolas2412 6y ago
30 cases, but only 2 deaths i think.
118.
by legolas2412 6y ago
> is it the "old homeland" bullshit Israeli propoganda loves to spew ? How old does something needs to be for it to be bullshit. Because the land palestinians have lost is now pretty old too, and their claim is subsequently bul
119.
by legolas2412 6y ago
For eb2 and eb3 visas, For chinese and mexicans it's similar. For everyone else, no.
120.
by legolas2412 6y ago
Your argument is all over the place, and it literally says that i said originally. That the differences are caused by a variety of reasons and not just racism. For example, you started with saying that white women are racist for not teachin

More ›