leaveyou

29 ms·

301.
by leaveyou 12y ago
Normally I don't reply in this kind of situations but I make an exception: 1 I think You misunderstand Go. 2 You complain about something you admit you don't know well. 3 You want the development to be more the way you want it wit
302.
by leaveyou 12y ago
I think you should do what you ask to be done. You fork Go under a new name, create a community with the same objectives as yours around it, be competitive and develop the language further and then reap the satisfaction. If there is a signi
303.
by leaveyou 12y ago
it brings back memories indeed.. me watching in disbelief how long, ugly and weird Microsoft C/C++ Win32 or even MFC programming for Windows was, compared to Borland Delphi or C++ Builder. I tried, I really tried to like it but in the
304.
by leaveyou 12y ago
You are not alone. Here is some guy doing something similar but his syntax is not so heavily inspired by Go (but still steps forward): c2lang.org
305.
by leaveyou 12y ago
Interesting spin of the facts indeed. I wonder who paid Rudolph to make this study.. I suspect it wasn't the workers :D
306.
by leaveyou 12y ago
D is a better C++. My feeling is that many people wanted just a better C (a portable & extensible assembler with a good standard library?).
307.
by leaveyou 12y ago
The source of the "bullshit" is in the beginning of the second sentence: I. I dared to have an opinion based on my observations regarding the effort needed to decipher a C declaration combined with my conviction that my cognitive
308.
by leaveyou 12y ago
It was a very sad day for computing when Ritchie released this brain fart upon the world. I think this "invention" called spiral rule is one significant reason why so many good programmers who know or knew C at one point don&#x27
309.
by leaveyou 12y ago
Many times I want to program in C or try to debug some open source apps but I'm always reminded why I didn't touch C/C++ since high school: macros, #include, CONSTANTS, long_identifiers, ugly castings everywhere and cryptic f
310.
by leaveyou 12y ago
I guess that was one of the first but still remarkable nail in the British Empire's coffin..
311.
by leaveyou 12y ago
I watched the video only after I saw your remark and I have to agree. It's the first advertisement in ages that nearly got me interested into what they have to sell. I usually can't stand a classic video presentation.
312.
by leaveyou 12y ago
"And if communication between the unmanned boats and the sailor overseeing them were ever broken, the boat would automatically shut down." Isn't this a major vulnerability ?
313.
by leaveyou 12y ago
As a "romanian person" I'm very familiar with that atmosphere too and in my opinion there is an ongoing "security" trade between US and Poland, Romania and other countries in the area in the sense that US provides t
314.
by leaveyou 12y ago
First, I'm not american and I don't make excuses for the US here but my feeling is that if what Poland gave to US was secret, then it's very likely that what Poland received from US in return is secret too. Apart from that, w
315.
by leaveyou 12y ago
What is impressive about that movie ? To me it's quite the opposite.. it's not impressive at all (too dark, bad fps) and when I watch it there is something in it that causes head aches. It's very hard to watch.
316.
by leaveyou 12y ago
My opinion is, first, that this development is fueled for political and national security gains mainly and the commercial aspects of it are lower on the list. And second, if you try to measure the richness of those countries in dollars, the
317.
by leaveyou 12y ago
In the long run, not only are they (the russians) going to use it in place of any foreign CPUs but lots of states which currently have no options would prefer to buy processors and software from the russians rather than the americans (Brazi
318.
by leaveyou 12y ago
"The key is real, effective, targeting of that tiny minority who..." that's what they want you to believe, bahahahaha :D. Ok, ok I'm not paranoid. But can "we" (common people) really know what "they"
319.
by leaveyou 12y ago
OK, I get it, I should have put that in quotes, because that is the message I perceive from BBC, not my message.
320.
by leaveyou 12y ago
You said "No", but I don't find the contradiction...
321.
by leaveyou 12y ago
Every time "Germany" and "privacy" end up in the same sentence, inevitably there will be a reference to STASI. There is also a subtle message there: Germans only care about their privacy because of STASI. As if the other
322.
by leaveyou 12y ago
Powerful. So much money and still big souls. There is hope.
323.
by leaveyou 12y ago
nah, people would just google yahoo with bing.
324.
by leaveyou 12y ago
A society like the one you describe should not have nuclear weapons. Now I'm afraid that if it weren't for the MAD (mutual assured destruction) US would have been much more genocidal.
325.
by leaveyou 12y ago
Again, I agree with you with one exception: banks have an unfair advantage and a monopoly over money creation. With the fractional reserve banking, banks take interest on money they don't have and in partnership with large corporations
326.
by leaveyou 12y ago
I agree with you on many points. Trying to keep my messages short, I made them too ambiguous. I'm not a Luddite. My only worry is that Thomas Piketty may be right. I don't know where you live, but where I come from, there is a ver
327.
by leaveyou 12y ago
Personally I specialize in warehouses because with the coming levels of automation, increase of robotic productivity and loss of jobs, there will be so many products and so few customers that only bigger warehouses will be the solution :)
328.
by leaveyou 12y ago
@dimillian I can't give details. I'm too afraid to associate the enormous number of hours I wasted with online gaming even with this relatively anonymous nickname.
329.
by leaveyou 12y ago
I'm not for banning. I'm for actively discouraging people who "have nothing to do" with their time, from seeking refuge in something which is actively designed to captivate them and consume as much of their resources as
330.
by leaveyou 12y ago
-10000 for online gaming. You don't know it yet but online gaming can ruin your life. It's the most accessible, inoffensive looking, procrastination enhancing, important decision delaying, time wasting, addictive habit/hobby&

More ›