leaveyou

37 ms·

331.
by leaveyou 12y ago
"It was bad because you couldn't get basic goods". True. But the current system is (even more?) problematic because you can't get basic JOBS. And not only that but a fundamental part of the current system is the accelera
332.
by leaveyou 12y ago
@collyw The original communism (the one "by the working class for the working class") is blue, cold and not coming back soon..
333.
by leaveyou 12y ago
As Arthur Clarke would say: Any sufficiently advanced "bread and circuses" is indistinguishable from freedom and democracy.
334.
by leaveyou 12y ago
It's quite funny how little people know about communism, why it appeared, how it developed and what influence it had over capitalism & why it collapsed although less than 25 years passed since its collapse.
335.
by leaveyou 12y ago
Consolidation is also favored by cheap money (yes, back to money monopoly thingy). Above some threshold and especially if you are in good relations with a bank, it is far easier to buy your competitors and dismantle them by selling their as
336.
by leaveyou 12y ago
@_broody: if it becomes a race to the bottom and it will not provide a decent income then people will not practice it (like any other job). Why not let the demand & competition regulate the market instead of some bureaucracy ? If my job
337.
by leaveyou 12y ago
So FBI infiltrated a bunch of delusional nerds, focused their attention on several countries with which US has rather cold relations and when the job was done, put the nerds in jail. To me it sounds like two birdies with one shot <<cl
338.
by leaveyou 12y ago
It's verbose and explicit but this is like using tests for your programs: boring and annoying short term but very useful medium and long term.
339.
by leaveyou 12y ago
If you search for "err != nil" it returns more: 13,153
340.
by leaveyou 12y ago
"if you believe that all humans share equal rights". In practice it doesn't matter what he or most of the British citizens believe. It doesn't matter even what the British people in power believe or what they say publicl
341.
by leaveyou 12y ago
Don't mix absolute hours of work with the ratio of hours of work relative to hours of retirement. The parent comment tried to argue that the former is decreasing because the latter is decreasing which is false. You point that the latte
342.
by leaveyou 12y ago
Are you suggesting Google should hire more people that don't do well in CS algorithms or that non-whites and non-asians are not top college kids or both ? Personally I'm all in for total randomization of hiring. nextEmployee = cv
343.
by leaveyou 12y ago
I tell you why "we" stopped striving to work less. The industrial revolution and the productivity it brought with it, allowed more people to get richer faster than ever before and that is a good thing but this led to a snowball ef
344.
by leaveyou 12y ago
If you live longer but you retire at the same age or more, there is no reduction of work. It's just longer retirement but nothing even close to "substantially reducing the number of hours we work".
345.
by leaveyou 12y ago
I'm not sure I get your logic. During the last 50-100 years: the population was continuously growing, the percent of employed population was continuously growing (women entered workforce like never before), the retirement age was alway
346.
by leaveyou 12y ago
It's not such a big problem if you consider that many CEOs are paid well over 200x more than their nonsupervisor worker. http://go.bloomberg.com/multimedia/ceo-pay-ratio/ http://www.businessweek.co
347.
by leaveyou 12y ago
Personally I'm fine with redistribution of work. People should work less hours to make room for more people to be employed. When you see that 25% of the workforce is unemployed or employed only from time to time and the economy is stag
348.
by leaveyou 12y ago
Funny how "spiritualism" is brought up as a solution in what seems to be an economical crisis.
349.
by leaveyou 12y ago
"job creator" is the new "slave owner" but hey, somebody has to do it... employ or be employed, no better alternative at horizon I'm afraid.
350.
by leaveyou 12y ago
"C# is faster than Go" do you have some links to prove that statement ? I'm really interested because in all the benchmarks I saw, C# seemed much more slower.
351.
by leaveyou 12y ago
I wonder why did they downvote you. I'm a long time C# dev and recently used Go for some projects and when I saw this I was thinking exactly the same.
352.
by leaveyou 12y ago
If we go in details, we can also add that goroutines created in init() or at init time are effectively started only after all init() functions finish.
353.
by leaveyou 12y ago
Function main() in package "main" is the entry point for a Go application but it is not the first code that gets executed when you start a Go app. Each package can have an init() function which gets executed in the order of depend
354.
by leaveyou 12y ago
Doesn't your system refuse root login by ssh by default ? If I remember correctly, on ubuntu server, sshd is configured by default to not allow root login from remote addresses.
355.
by leaveyou 13y ago
>>I don't get what Go has that rust hasn't for a "better c"<< Go has a stable version. Go has a sane syntax and especially a sane approach to concurrency. Go is so simple you can learn it in less than a week.
356.
by leaveyou 13y ago
I would like to clarify. He is a monster and she is a natural born victim. Now can you replace my wasted karma please ?
357.
by leaveyou 13y ago
I use https://code.google.com/p/liteide/ on ubuntu and it works well for my needs (and it gets better with each version). It has all the basic features of an editor and the code completion is quite good in the las
358.
by leaveyou 13y ago
"There is no conclusive evidence that rising inequality will have bad consequences on say growth". Lets say economy is an organism like a human and money is the blood. Would you say that this organism is healthy and grows normally
359.
by leaveyou 13y ago
Judging from the abundance of "left", "neo-Marxist" and "class warfare" it's quite critical, but no matter how they spin it (with straw men like "there will always be inequality in capitalism", &
360.
by leaveyou 13y ago
I don't know where you get your info but in the translation of show I saw he said: 1)the interception is clearly regulated by russian law 2)of course they intercept communications 3)they don't do mass interception and not at the U

More ›