lazyeye

37 ms·

691.
by lazyeye 4y ago
Pretty much everything you've stated is either false or a distortion. I'II leave it there.
692.
by lazyeye 4y ago
How is a credible witness directly involved with the matter at hand, present at meetings with Joe Biden "pretty weak"? This is not hearsay, this is a statement from someone who was present? What would be strong evidence, video I s
693.
by lazyeye 4y ago
Comer Reveals Biden Family Members Receiving Payments from Chinese Energy Company https://oversight.house.gov/release/comer-reveals-biden-fami... Hunter Biden's business partner outlines Joe Biden's involveme
694.
by lazyeye 4y ago
ok well I think for most people this "social fact" aligns exactly with reality, and as you've already stated, people are always rational actors so...
695.
by lazyeye 4y ago
Yes but govts can try to minimize the damage from people making bad decisions. Which they do constantly, across all areas of society. And what you describe as "neo-liberal mumbo-jumbo" I think for most people would be seen as simp
696.
by lazyeye 4y ago
Or we may as well have no laws because people are completely rational actors no matter their age etc... And you didn't address my point with respect to young people's lack of life experience. Or that trade relationships should be
697.
by lazyeye 4y ago
Exactly and young people lack the life experience to comprehend the long-term risks associated with surrendering their private data to the CCP or being exposed to sophisticated disinformation campaigns over time. So it is incumbent on the g
698.
by lazyeye 4y ago
Ridiculous argument. A lot of people choose meth.
699.
by lazyeye 4y ago
But its not open markets if one partner blocks all access to it's own market? In what other trade context would this scenario be acceptable? And how does giving access to an authoritarian regime, famous for controlling speech, promote
700.
by lazyeye 4y ago
Nowhere near enough. The Guardian needs to be shut down permanently and all its employees cancelled.
701.
by lazyeye 4y ago
Bytedance is a Chinese company that is required by law to take direction from the CCP. The CCP may find it useful to promote/suppress particular content regardless of the geographic location of the creator.
702.
by lazyeye 4y ago
I think they feel more threatened by any kind of regulation, regardless of the target.
703.
by lazyeye 4y ago
All the people here desperately trying to find some argument in favor of an absurdly one-sided relationship in China's favour. Silicon Valley truly is the enemy.
704.
by lazyeye 4y ago
This is a ridiculously naive take.
705.
by lazyeye 4y ago
They just move into the more AI resistant sectors of the economy (putting a big downward pressure on wages for those remaining jobs of course).
706.
by lazyeye 4y ago
Taiwan is not part of China, period. Nation states have a policy of "strategic ambiguity" as a matter of diplomatic convenience but the US is not considering supplying weaponry to Taiwan because it is part of China. https:/&
707.
by lazyeye 4y ago
Lol...fairly desperate semantics there.
708.
by lazyeye 4y ago
Because young people, like everbody at that stage in life, are too stupid and ignorant to know how stupid and ignorant they are.
709.
by lazyeye 4y ago
Why would people in congress invest in America's primary geo-strategic competitor? How is not doing this in any way a bad thing?
710.
by lazyeye 4y ago
Absolutely. Without question.
711.
by lazyeye 4y ago
In what other trade context would it be ok for one partner to block all access to their own market (Facebook, Twitter etc) whilst still enjoying full access to everybody else's? How is this remotely acceptable?
712.
by lazyeye 4y ago
An easy out. I stand by my comment completely.
713.
by lazyeye 4y ago
To quote the Big Lebowski..."well that's just your opinion man"
714.
by lazyeye 4y ago
I've no idea what the Spanish inquisition has to do with the clear and obvious tendency towards an oppressive totalitarianism by left-wing movements throughout history. I think you have to be willfully blind to deny this.
715.
by lazyeye 4y ago
It's a mystery to me how those on the left get to spend so much time focusing on the threat of nazism whilst completely ignoring their own horrific history. I dont know how they get away with it.
716.
by lazyeye 4y ago
It seems for the most part though, only one side is reported in the majority of the media and/or prosecuted.
717.
by lazyeye 4y ago
Would a Roger Stone or Steve Bannon type fake a Russian collusion dossier and then run it through the media for literally years? What are the "types" that would do something like this? https://www.bbc.com/news&#x2F
718.
by lazyeye 4y ago
Alot of people found the Twitter files very interesting indeed, just not the left-wing media.
719.
by lazyeye 4y ago
The subjects you are talking about can't be discussed/debated outside Florida, just accepted.
720.
by lazyeye 4y ago
Also I've heard good things about LimeLM https://wyday.com/limelm/

More ›