l0pu

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by l0pu 8y ago

   That is why I propose to pay insurance so that resources will be outside
2. 2.▲
   by l0pu 8y ago

   US may have enough resources to pay compensation “above zero” if it will be crazy enough to use nukes against Mexico. So it is the question of risk of applying of nukes and stated premium amount whether US should pay anything or not (btw in
3. 3.▲
   by l0pu 8y ago

   Firstly, this peace has no guarantees, secondly, the potential destruction is only increasing with the time. Do you think that every country will have nukes in the future? Do you think it is the smartest of all possibilities? Nuclear weapon
4. 4.▲
   by l0pu 8y ago

   It is zero by now. I propose to make it as high as possible
5. 5.▲
   by l0pu 8y ago

   It is the same problem as with human rights but multiplied by billions. If the world’s majority will accept this proposal, then it could make the minority to accept it too as it is fair enough. Technically it could be smarter sanctions and
6. 6.▲
   by l0pu 8y ago

   No country should be allowed to have mass-destructive weapons unless it has enough resources to compensate the damage that it can bring with it. More over the countries that possess mass-destructive weapons should pay insurance to its poten