4 ms·
No country should be allowed to have mass-destructive weapons unless it has enough resources to compensate the damage that it can bring with it. More over the c
by l0pu 8y ago
No country should be allowed to have mass-destructive weapons unless it has enough resources to compensate the damage that it can bring with it. More over the countries that possess mass-destructive weapons should pay insurance to its potential victims. I think it is the right way to disarm entire world.
- smacktoward 8y agoHow do you propose to make someone with a nuclear weapon do something they don't want to do?
- l0pu 8y agoIt is the same problem as with human rights but multiplied by billions. If the world’s majority will accept this proposal, then it could make the minority to accept it too as it is fair enough. Technically it could be smarter sanctions and militarizing the borders of violator
- SketchySeaBeast 8y agoWhat is the insurance premium on causing untold death and destruction due to nuclear hellfire?
- l0pu 8y agoIt is zero by now. I propose to make it as high as possible
- SketchySeaBeast 8y agoI look forward to reality where the US pays Mexico just for being its neighbour.
- l0pu 8y agoUS may have enough resources to pay compensation “above zero” if it will be crazy enough to use nukes against Mexico. So it is the question of risk of applying of nukes and stated premium amount whether US should pay anything or not (btw insurance should be paid to safe places such as union of nations who will be able to give this money to victims) The idea is to make a law against poor unpredicted countries with nukes (such as Pakistan or North Korea) so that they don’t use nukes as argument in the politics to make profits as it could end up badly.
- SketchySeaBeast 8y agoDidn't your original message say "neighbors"?
- apexkid 8y agoWeapons are the reason there is peace in the world after WW2. Countries with no lethal weapons like Syria are facing war as of now while North korea doesn't.
- l0pu 8y agoFirstly, this peace has no guarantees, secondly, the potential destruction is only increasing with the time. Do you think that every country will have nukes in the future? Do you think it is the smartest of all possibilities? Nuclear weapons could make irreversible changes on the Earth. It is much dangerous than any war.
- tyingq 8y agoAny country that launches nukes will likely be retaliated against with nukes from another country, one allied with the original target maybe. After that, they may not have "enough resources to compensate the damage"
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- l0pu 8y agoThat is why I propose to pay insurance so that resources will be outside
- anth_anm 8y agoNuclear politics are a lot more complex than this.