ktallett

29 ms·

631.
by ktallett 2y ago
Of course, there will be an outlier. I didn't state no history. One person doing wrong after being released shouldn't mean no one gets released.
632.
by ktallett 2y ago
Even if you compare like for like, SR Vs SR2, the responses, charges, and sentences still aren't the same.
633.
by ktallett 2y ago
I mean daily we have responses and posts based on feels, but anyway I would state mine is based on fact. Firstly, The sentence for running the exact same website, was 5 years. https://www.vice.com/en/article/silk-r
634.
by ktallett 2y ago
He was never a drug dealer, he provided a platform that was used to sell drugs. The pardon was a surprise, however his sentence was unfairly strict and he was clearly made an example out of that hasn't happened to any other platform pr
635.
by ktallett 2y ago
Based on the sheer number of posts that have misrepresented the charges or misunderstood why he was actually in prison, it appears to partially be a lack of knowledge on the case, likely due to time hazing some of the memories. Of course so
636.
by ktallett 2y ago
I am not sure of the legality around his possessions but they are long gone. Even the ones stolen by FBI officers during the course of the investigation.
637.
by ktallett 2y ago
Whilst I understand your point of view that the change in circumstances can change how someone decides to act, I don't believe there is much history to show someone who gained a surprising second chance outside of prison has gone back
638.
by ktallett 2y ago
Because their isn't a change in law doesn't mean the convictions were secure and bound by law before.
639.
by ktallett 2y ago
He has admitted his wrong doings and made efforts to change whilst in prison. I doubt he will go straight back to a life even remotely close to before. He was doing good in prison for other inmates and I imagine he will continue doing the s
640.
by ktallett 2y ago
Those with no failures never tried. Now I'm the complete opposite of someone who would usually say that but I believe it to be true. Failure at things is ok, it's just part of doing stuff. Just like death is an outcome of life. An
641.
by ktallett 2y ago
I enjoyed the site and found it useful to begin with however it became a playground for people who felt they were know it alls to get recognition. A little ego boost if you will and that ruined the point for me, which was to get a varied re
642.
by ktallett 2y ago
That is how any social media website works including this one.
643.
by ktallett 2y ago
Success is viewed differently by some. Being educated, having healthy lives, having access to many public servicesnare seen as a successful healthy life by many.
644.
by ktallett 2y ago
Most of the issues here relate to scale and actual quality of the idea/business in the first place. Hard things can really be split into, challenging but a problem to solve, or this never should have become a business. The former will
645.
by ktallett 2y ago
Is the UK more in line with the norm though and the US is the outlier? I would say the UK, Europe, and Japan all have similar wages (although Japan has worse benefits and on the whole a larger expectation of workers so it's not like fo
646.
by ktallett 2y ago
I completely agree with you. These anti cheat systems, whether it is related to video games or university work or anything in life, need to be fully open and transparent otherwise as you say without understanding and proof of what you did w
647.
by ktallett 2y ago
Without that it is impossible to make conclusions on whether anyone cheated. I think we actually agree, although I would use not guilty in the court of law standard, whereby it means not enough evidence to convict, not in the not guilty ==
648.
by ktallett 2y ago
It's pretty rare, like any guessing game there are advantages and on the whole traitors entering last as I believe happened less often than the percentage of traitors to faithfuls would allow if it was randomised.
649.
by ktallett 2y ago
Why do you believe they are almost always right? Without understanding the anti cheating technology, I feel it's impossible to judge.
650.
by ktallett 2y ago
Whilst it was an interesting read, it still doesn't quite state why they believed he was cheating and what methods are taken on deciding that. Without that it is impossible to make conclusions.
651.
by ktallett 2y ago
There is a gog galaxy Linux replacement called MiniGalaxy
652.
by ktallett 2y ago
I would be inclined to agree with you, the issues is related to the healthcare vastly overcharging for basic acts such as giving simple drugs such as ibuprofen or paracetemol.
653.
by ktallett 2y ago
Someone who won't say no and follows orders blindly is harder to work with than someone with unrealistic expectations and ideas. The latter is easier to deal with than the former in my view.
654.
by ktallett 2y ago
The issue should be less focused on why aren't the workers doing more, but more on who has let the few have so much power over others without being challenged. Society as a concept fails without workers.
655.
by ktallett 2y ago
Of course, high enough up that is true, however there are always those middle management evangelists who have believed the word from the CEO and chosen that their workers should follow their lead.
656.
by ktallett 2y ago
It is an interesting question. In many situations, the majority organising would produce significant change, however as a society we very rarely do it. Why not?
657.
by ktallett 2y ago
Do ant colonies have a scrum master who have no clue how realistic goals are or not but decide to set them anyway? Do ant colonies avoid listening to those with actual knowledge and skillsets that goes against their unrealistic expectations
658.
by ktallett 2y ago
More money being made but the workers not seeing the benefits of that is of course going to lead to low morale.
659.
by ktallett 2y ago
Is it the actual task they dislike or the fact there is no care or consideration for workers as human beings? I imagine many would enjoy their jobs a lot more if you had less focus on what is seemingly productive behaviour, aka coming into
660.
by ktallett 2y ago
I believe like for like on products, some food's in the US are of a lower quality due to food standard laws being poorer. Chocolate for example must include 10% cacao in the US and 20% in Europe, hence Europe's will taste differen

More ›