3 ms·
It is an interesting question. In many situations, the majority organising would produce significant change, however as a society we very rarely do it. Why not?
by ktallett 2y ago
It is an interesting question. In many situations, the majority organising would produce significant change, however as a society we very rarely do it. Why not?
- 9rx 2y agoIt is hard and time consuming work so until things become intolerably bad people would rather do something else that they find more enjoyable, like complain on the internet.
- yoyohello13 2y agoI think it's a combination of things not being bad enough to actually motivate change, and the anti-union propoganda/union-busting from the entities in power.