Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
kreetx
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
31.
▲
by
kreetx
8mo ago
Why pick on the expression when you could point out that the opposite is true? If it is, do say.
32.
▲
by
kreetx
8mo ago
They do, but also only physically.
33.
▲
by
kreetx
8mo ago
Well, the "enemy" of the protesters are the ICE officers. When drawing Nazi Germany comparisons I was pointing out that during those times people weren't whistling along German soldiers when they didn't agree to what the
34.
▲
by
kreetx
8mo ago
Jews were stripped of citizenship after 1933, so in fact they were. Quite similar to how citizens of US have European, African, etc. heritage but are still citizens.
35.
▲
by
kreetx
8mo ago
Funny, how the anti ICE crowd wants people to immigrate illegally. What about voting somebody to the office and changing the laws instead?
36.
▲
by
kreetx
8mo ago
Yup. The script that you execute should literally be the one that you read. (I.e, no downloading twice)
37.
▲
by
kreetx
8mo ago
While true, then I'd just skip installing these products and find another way. And if this is the only way and the product is important (say, brew), make an exception.
38.
▲
by
kreetx
8mo ago
Summary: legal immigration is very difficult to impossible. The solution, IMO, isn't "just enter illegally". When you're not a citizen then, quite frankly, the fact that you want to immigrate doesn't matter. It&#x
39.
▲
by
kreetx
8mo ago
If you look closely, Jews were citizens and an ethnic group. Jews also somehow weren't able protest along with the enemy while whistling. An anti-Bloomberg headline might run like this: Bloomberg wants detention centers for illegals to
40.
▲
by
kreetx
8mo ago
From what I've understood, Trump was elected to get illegals out. It also seems that the crime rate is actually going down.
41.
▲
by
kreetx
8mo ago
Planning ahead to put your own health at risk?
42.
▲
by
kreetx
8mo ago
I'd call it the presidential victory mandate . I guess he shouldn't actually do what he promised as the victory wasn't large enough? "Damned if you do, damned if you don't."
43.
▲
by
kreetx
8mo ago
Because the alledged pretext assumes being able to predict the future.
44.
▲
by
kreetx
8mo ago
When driving towards a law enforcement officer, it is you assaulting them, not the other way around. Fleeing is against the law as well. Why did the woman attempt this? Ot, if it was so dangerous, what was she doing there?
45.
▲
by
kreetx
8mo ago
Why do you say "not all warrants are the same" while them being different is immaterial? Also, why even "protest" at these events when the people targeted by ICE haven't determined to be illegal immigrants? They can
46.
▲
by
kreetx
8mo ago
It does: in context of an active war having a gun won't surprise anyone. In context of arresting someone and seeing a gun on that person makes that person appear lethally dangerous.
47.
▲
by
kreetx
8mo ago
Here is at least some video infication that Pretti's gun did go off: https://youtu.be/JFSBPEQYSFE?si=hWz6bthbUtOmprhh There'll likely be a deeper investigation and a report to say whether that's true or not.
48.
▲
by
kreetx
8mo ago
Say officers report that Alex was aggressive on the day he died but there is no video material. The events from a week ago support those statements, as clearly Alex is a man that is quite worked up and capable of physical aggression.
49.
▲
by
kreetx
8mo ago
Ah, there appears to be video material indicating Pretti's gun going off: https://youtu.be/JFSBPEQYSFE?si=hWz6bthbUtOmprhh
50.
▲
by
kreetx
8mo ago
Pretty sure cops in general get scared similar to how normal people do.
51.
▲
by
kreetx
8mo ago
There appears to be video material indicating Pretti's gun going off referenced here https://youtu.be/JFSBPEQYSFE?si=hWz6bthbUtOmprhh
52.
▲
by
kreetx
8mo ago
If you're afraid of ICE agents, what are you doing in the area anyway?
53.
▲
by
kreetx
8mo ago
If you look at the video, then the woman turns the front of the car towards the agent, who comes from the other side. Do you mean that he knew the movement that was going to happen and risked his life to do that. Would you say the woman was
54.
▲
by
kreetx
8mo ago
And as I said, there was no pretext to execute her. (Or you need to explain what the word "pretext" means to you, and perhaps also "execute".)
55.
▲
by
kreetx
8mo ago
I don't live in the US. Also I edited my parent answer (but no need to edit yours. Continue below at will.) I maintain that what was voted in the office a year ago was to deport the illegals, not only those who have committed other cri
56.
▲
by
kreetx
8mo ago
Right. The original poster who was saying that only ("only"!) 29% of January deportees have been convicted, that is correct. To this I added that that percentage doesn't account for ongoing charges (also true, right?). No dis
57.
▲
by
kreetx
8mo ago
There was no pretext to execute her. It's when she started driving (even spun the wheels I think) towards the officer were shots fired. In your mind, does police getaway equate with protesting now?
58.
▲
by
kreetx
8mo ago
Everything is more nuanced than your all-or-nothing any of it designation. You say that there was no getaway performed and the person trying to drive away wasn't aware that it was law enforcement that had ordered her to stay. Sure, s
59.
▲
by
kreetx
8mo ago
Isn't "due process" for an illegal immigrant already happened in the sense that they are determined to be an illegal? Trump had deporting illegals in his campaign and got mandate from the people. You don't seem to believ
60.
▲
by
kreetx
8mo ago
I've seen the actual videos. While tragic, then she was trying to drive away, not obeying the approaching officer's orders. At that moment, the officer towards she was driving was the one that shot her. It also seemed that right b
More ›