4 ms·
Well, the "enemy" of the protesters are the ICE officers. When drawing Nazi Germany comparisons I was pointing out that during those times people weren't whistl
by kreetx 8mo ago
Well, the "enemy" of the protesters are the ICE officers. When drawing Nazi Germany comparisons I was pointing out that during those times people weren't whistling along German soldiers when they didn't agree to what they were doing.
- donkeybeer 8mo agoProtest "along" is a strange word then. But the main question has always been prove illegality and come with actual legal warrants and don't commit terrorist acts on random civilians, if ICE were merely following the law the protests would have been much smaller.
- kreetx 8mo ago[flagged]
- donkeybeer 8mo agoThey are not interfering, you still don't seem to understand filming or protesting cops or engaging in any other act of free speech in public does no require permission. Out of courtesy local govt may be informed but engagement in speech is not illegal. And again you fail to understand the problem is that ICE they aren't waiting for proof before killing or jailing people. In fact in many cases they are engaging in home invasions which are clear cut illegal unless the real not karen warrant is presented. In fact Minnesota is a castle doctrine state, meaning if cornered on your own property you can quite legally shoot the invader including killing them. It's not just theoretical, it has already happened in many states.
- kreetx 8mo ago[flagged]
- donkeybeer 8mo agoICE proof doesn't count for shit unless they have a real warrant. Otherwise legally they are quite limited. You still haven't been able to establish how or why or case laws citing whistling at cops is illegal. You have very deep and fundamental misunderstanding of American law. Whatever country you are from has clearly messed eith your brain to the extent you can't even imagine countries with actual free speech existing. You still do not understand, whether someones an "illegal" or not is NOT for ice or any police force to establish, its for courts to establish. You also failed to respond how any thing at all gives ICE the permission to commit terrostic acts of vile violence against innocent civilian bystanders. You are even repeating the soundly disproven lie of the terrorist "cop" beung ran into. You have very clear, very fundamental psychotic delusional disorders where repeatedly explained extremely clear things do not enter your mind and you mindlessly keep repeating disproven things like a broken record and fail to ever cite any statistics or case law despite being repeatedly asked to.
- donkeybeer 8mo agoIf ICE are this deeply unfit to their job that fundamental exercise of free spech and the right to bear arms causes them to engage in paranoid violent psychoses then they are free to quit the job, nobody is forcing them or holding down their hands.
- donkeybeer 8mo ago>ICE has "proof" for an illegal, as otherwise they wouldn't know who they are capturing. Correct. They don't know. They are performing random home invasions and kidnappings without caring for who or what.
- donkeybeer 8mo agoWhat's the relevance of whistling? It's not clear if it's illegal, warning motorists about speed ticketing cops is legal for example.