3 ms·
Very cool. Of course we both understand that this is the case - this is why it is in scare quotes. You are arguing about something I literally acknowledged in m
by krageon 17d ago
Very cool. Of course we both understand that this is the case - this is why it is in scare quotes. You are arguing about something I literally acknowledged in my original post. The issue is that it happened due to what is for all intents and purposes bitrot: It breaks during regular use due to small compounding errors that happen due to bad software design. In practical use this means what I wrote, even though to the most pedantic of nerds it means literally what happened. It can in fact mean both things
- PorciiVorbesc 16d ago>It breaks during regular use due to small compounding errors that happen due to bad software design. And where's the proof/documentation for this, if it's as common as you suggest? If it were a design problem as you say, then everyone would have the exact same failures with the same incidence rate, but they don't.