koe123

6 ms·

31.
by koe123 2mo ago
I have a theory that AI code looks good because you never subsequently come up with your own alternative.
32.
by koe123 2mo ago
“Heh, we’re fucking awful, but check out what THOSE GUYS (who aren’t a first world country with international relationships and funding, i.e. where upholding a similar standard is laughable) are doing”
33.
by koe123 2mo ago
Effective altruism is a grift that justifies “get as much money as possible for the individual” so that “you can then so something good with it”. Aha! OK bro you’re saying you should have all the things huh? Anyone into this shit should be
34.
by koe123 2mo ago
Ray William Johnson…?
35.
by koe123 2mo ago
Cool so you can share nazi talking points on TV? You can call for violence on the TV?
36.
by koe123 2mo ago
Care to elaborate? You don’t think the creator of “You should self harm: the TV show” would’ve been regulated and held accountable for the detrimental consequences back in the day? Not saying it was perfect back then, but today I do think i
37.
by koe123 2mo ago
Every single time historically we have unregulated media you get a shitshow. I think you can blame our societies nonchalant lassez faire attitude to the propaganda profiteering by American big tech for lots of the issues we face today. Hone
38.
by koe123 2mo ago
Curious: are there any republicans left on HN? I have no concept of how you can defend this
39.
by koe123 2mo ago
No wonder for the overcompensation on the worldstage!
40.
by koe123 2mo ago
Thats true, although once it stops being a party trick I expect the LLM proof mining to also be paid by someone else and be expensive as shit, the question same remains: who?
41.
by koe123 2mo ago
In fact the opposite, look at talks by Peter Thiel. At least he’s being honest. These people are bastards, but for some reason moral goodness and wealth has been conflated leading us to venerate greed.
42.
by koe123 2mo ago
On the other hand, if provided the financial incentive would mathematicians have solved these problems? Its not hard to imagine a world where some hard problems were not selected by the sparse experts for whatever reason (lack of interest,
43.
by koe123 3mo ago
How does anyone justify this? How can you argue this in good faith?
44.
by koe123 3mo ago
I am not convinced by your retort, which essentially boils down to “some people pirate, so its ironic some people, maybe different, are mad at dario!”
45.
by koe123 3mo ago
By that same logic I think OpenAI should get into the burger business for those who cannot cook.
46.
by koe123 3mo ago
I am surprised they released this. Who is the audience for this? You can DIY this yourself surely.
47.
by koe123 3mo ago
This in my view was always manufactured. Consider the wars in the past 50 years. Although I imagine you have a point: American police do perhaps act this way.
48.
by koe123 3mo ago
Oh come on. Look at the government of the USA.
49.
by koe123 3mo ago
Interesting! Thanks for sharing.
50.
by koe123 3mo ago
UPI is cool! Anyone can put numbers to how this affects the growth of india? Formalizing parts of the economy perhaps?
51.
by koe123 3mo ago
Not necessarily, but in any case not a monopoly. E.g. Elon Musk now owns all highways: better or worse? Some distributed ownership seems useful as it distributes power accordingly.
52.
by koe123 3mo ago
Interesting point, I think you are right about it being upstream!
53.
by koe123 3mo ago
I enjoy using AI loads. Yet I would be keen to see numbers on actual productivity increases. This reads as yet another datapoint similar to what I’ve experienced: maybe code was the bottleneck at some point, maybe now it isn’t but in my liv
54.
by koe123 3mo ago
You reckon there could be any selection bias? Some means justify the ends reasoning.
55.
by koe123 3mo ago
I am far from a mathematician but I am excited by the possibilities of using AI for generating more math. Math in my mind exists purely in the world of forms, and cannot be appropriated for profit, but is downstream to everything else. I am
56.
by koe123 3mo ago
I still don't see why it should be one man rather than commonly owned infrastructure.
57.
by koe123 3mo ago
It is one person who controls it, at his discretion who gets to share in the utility. What your saying can also be true without such an ownership model, right?
58.
by koe123 3mo ago
And you’ve known about this problem for how many minutes?
59.
by koe123 3mo ago
> more addictive than hard drugs people should have the option This seems like a hot take given the (justifiably) illegality of stuff like fentanyl.
60.
by koe123 3mo ago
As much as I love democracy its unfortunate we both get to vote

More ›