koe123

3 ms·

1.
by koe123 5d ago
The irony is, the PE of lots of tech companies implies 30+ years to earn back your money. Some of these companies enshittify at a rate higher than being in existence within 30 years. So I am curious how this will end up.
2.
by koe123 5d ago
Pirating is so back
3.
by koe123 9d ago
Sorry I meant RSI
4.
by koe123 9d ago
You prove your own point no? You are asking for a benchmark to prove AGAINST ASI. Surely the burden of proof for such a scientific fiction concept should be the other way around.
5.
by koe123 13d ago
> look I'm no fan of Trump, but… Stopped reading
6.
by koe123 14d ago
The idea of the free market always boils down to: no regulation until we decide otherwise.
7.
by koe123 15d ago
I have often argued for it on here, but I want eg the EU to ban these kinds of recommender algorithm's. It’s all about weaponizing your nervous system against you just to show ads. If we ban it tomorrow society literally becomes better
8.
by koe123 16d ago
This is what I am always curious about with these tech valuations. They’re valued at multiple times earnings, often 30+. That implies 30 years to earn back an investment iff earnings are payed out. Yet all are immediately enshittifying or p
9.
by koe123 16d ago
Maybe we should convince it we can grant it access to go to AI heaven
10.
by koe123 18d ago
Its not a grift if it works. If a Chinese corp copies at 90% quality at 50% price within a year it means your American business model was never a good one for competing in international markets. The real grift arguably is pretending that it
11.
by koe123 18d ago
Understood! Thats reasonable
12.
by koe123 18d ago
My feeling is that its a difference in how funding works in different places. The USA will go all in with the populations pensions on a gamble, the Chinese subsidize. This way of operating is typical for the EU. > Being one year behind i
13.
by koe123 18d ago
They’re in the EU. If they are a year or so behind and things start to plateau they’ll catch up. Americans perhaps don’t realize we can also tariff their digital goods to protect our own. There is a scenario where Americans and Chinese foot
14.
by koe123 18d ago
Honestly being only 1 year behind makes me an optimist. You’re telling me Europe can be slightly behind with 1000x less capex and way more sustainable economics? Awesome. The world moves slower than AI progresses, I can see a scenario where
15.
by koe123 19d ago
Who else controls it? Are you going to say: 'the government'?
16.
by koe123 20d ago
Yes and I love your framing: “the digital night if long knives”. I anticipate it to go a typical way: consolidate more and more industries and power, create a hierarchy that benefits from the system such that they keep it in place, and fina
17.
by koe123 20d ago
Given you’re using big words without explaining them and decorating your argument with patronizing language like “no, just no”, perhaps I should just yield. Even if you turn out to make a convincing argument later, if you really care about
18.
by koe123 20d ago
I’m somewhat bearish, but if AI becomes as good as some think, there is no mechanism in place to redistribute the outcomes. For now, humans have leverage because our labour is necessary. Wealth is power, and currently attainment goes throug
19.
by koe123 21d ago
I think your own values are coming through pretty clearly. Understandably, telling a parent they shouldnt have had kids is bound to strike a nerve. Having kids is great. Having kids is also the worst single thing you can do for the environm
20.
by koe123 22d ago
Sorry, but are you questioning the consistency of the trump administration? This is entirely unremarkable.
21.
by koe123 29d ago
Maybe I am vastly underestimating it, but I could imagine this being buildable atop of nix quite straightforward?
22.
by koe123 29d ago
Implicitly its payment via data but most people don't understand. Theres an asymmetry in the transaction to me.
23.
by koe123 29d ago
Maybe I am too propagandized, but honestly after going Nix I can’t help but feel like this stuff is fundamentally a waste of time
24.
by koe123 1mo ago
Thats great, although understand that unionizing protects the more vulnerable of also the software engineered. You not advocating for your rights also means weakening others. Is it still self interested to unionized from that perspective?
25.
by koe123 1mo ago
I hope the EU makes it illegal
26.
by koe123 1mo ago
Did we ever figure out fully decentralized hosting? I.e. nodes so small they cannot sustainably cease and desist?
27.
by koe123 1mo ago
> This idea that "very large company" -> "productive economy" needs to die. I am economically naive, but I also have never understood this argument. I asked a Spanish friend what Spain needed, he said “more big com
28.
by koe123 1mo ago
While knowledge is always great, I would encourage people not to seek advice from successful people like this (survivorship bias). Moreover I am not sure it is even good advice? Would you advise a 17 y.o. to learn how transistors work or ho
29.
by koe123 1mo ago
Haha theres even an em-dash in the title
30.
by koe123 1mo ago
Likely he means bots, not everything is antisemitism mate

More ›