kmonsen

71 ms·

841.
by kmonsen 6y ago
I think you are both correct. Judges are not lawmakers but they sometimes come up with completely new interpretations of a law like for example Obergefell v Hodges, or Roe v Wade or citizens united etc. The current Qi is also a Supreme Cour
842.
by kmonsen 6y ago
True, but you cannot leave the court while waiting for the court case which is usually months and having this come up as a possibility is a terrifying thing. The problem is that it really matters the mood of that border agents. I have proba
843.
by kmonsen 6y ago
Right, then you can optimize the delivery with routes to several customers as well. And they can make food that handles delivery better etc. But that is not what is happening now.
844.
by kmonsen 6y ago
I think the key point is similar but slightly different. Traditional restaurants are not a good model for making food for delivery. The dishes are not created to be stored before eaten, it is higher cost because it is an experience to eat i
845.
by kmonsen 6y ago
Maybe the like the general idea of the company and their co-workers and want to change the company? I don't understand why you telling them what they can and cannot do.
846.
by kmonsen 6y ago
QI is a supreme court created concept and it would be best if they handled it.
847.
by kmonsen 6y ago
I discovered this with green card as well, one of the conditions to keep it is to not have permanent residence abroad. What this means is completely up to the border agent talking to you on arrival. There have been grandmas that have been a
848.
by kmonsen 6y ago
I’m not making an argument about Jesus but about his supposed followers. Anyway, the main point is that US law and the Bible are not connected. It’s still legal to eat shrimp and pork, and usury became legal when that was convenient.
849.
by kmonsen 6y ago
Really? Not the ones close to me, but I did not go out of my way to check recently. That does not seem to be essential businesses in my book, or more so than churches assuming proper social distancing rules.
850.
by kmonsen 6y ago
Not just standing armies (but true that makes the argument much stronger), but also the militarized police force. A SWAT team is a mini army and the combined states police forces could easy invade many countries today if that was an option.
851.
by kmonsen 6y ago
Several reason: - Civilians today do not have the means to stand up to a modern state. For a minor example see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waco_siege , note the outcome was never in any doubt just how much casualties
852.
by kmonsen 6y ago
Agree fully about ways of transporting that includes walking. I have seen many pictures of people using guns for intimidation. I remember one picture of a black kid in Charlottesville laying down with the hands up and armed protesters were
853.
by kmonsen 6y ago
They are still allowed religious service and practice, but in a controlled way that will not spread the virus.
854.
by kmonsen 6y ago
You are making strong statements about things you need to read up more on. The congress and others can put limits on religious practice in many ways. The most relevant example here is that building and fire codes apply for churches.
855.
by kmonsen 6y ago
It is not ignored, but there is a long practice of interpreting it and defining exactly what it means. You have to spend some effort here in understand it and how it has changed through history instead of expecting to be able to just read t
856.
by kmonsen 6y ago
I stand corrected it seems, it is still not happening in most of the state and not at all in Santa Clara where I live. In that case it seems a little bit inconsistent, but that is up to the governor to decide. I do feel he implemented this
857.
by kmonsen 6y ago
"The Church would suffer irreparable harm from not being able to hold services on Pentecost Sunday in a way that comparable secular businesses and persons can conduct their activities" This is the key to get an emergency stay of t
858.
by kmonsen 6y ago
Cannabis is not in any way a church or recognized as a sincere held religious belief by the supreme court I believe if that is what you mean.
859.
by kmonsen 6y ago
Yeah it is unclear what the rules were/are, but at least now staying open for curbside delivery is an option. This whole thing took us all by surprise so I can understand if there were minor implementation details in the beginning.
860.
by kmonsen 6y ago
Overall I would rather 2nd amendment would not exist and I don't think it belongs in a modern world (I am a retired soldier that has served abroad, and have gone to gun ranges to shoot). I think currently stronger background checks, st
861.
by kmonsen 6y ago
They wanted to stay fully open, not curbside delivery.
862.
by kmonsen 6y ago
Curbside pickup ammo and guns is allowed, see for example http://reedsindoorrange.com/
863.
by kmonsen 6y ago
I’m strongly in favor out stronger gun control but find your argument here reasonable. After a bit of googling I see that gun stores are indeed allowed to provide for curbside pickup and are open: http://reedsindoorrange.com&#x2F
864.
by kmonsen 6y ago
Also hobby lobby was not granted a stay as far as I’m aware, they had to wait for the final ruling.
865.
by kmonsen 6y ago
Should it not be the side they want the stay that had to prove irreparable harm? I see no evidence for this in the dissenting opinion.
866.
by kmonsen 6y ago
First of all, a religious text is not relevant in us court case, even if about a religious case. Secondly, Christianity as practiced today is very different and not something Jesus would have understood at all so in many ways the Bible and
867.
by kmonsen 6y ago
There are many parts of the constitution both parties would like to improve but that is not possible in the current environment. Conditions are in general meant to be broad so the last for a long time, and congress can implement laws around
868.
by kmonsen 6y ago
This is way more nuanced then your argument and all 9 Supreme Court justices would agree to this. For example fire hazard laws apply to churches even though it would seem to be in violation of your quote. Say you have to argue how this is r
869.
by kmonsen 6y ago
The were part is the key here, currently churches have more opportunity to be open (at least in bay area), so that part does not make sense.
870.
by kmonsen 6y ago
Cannabis dispensaries are currently closed except for medical patients (I know, but if a doctor has written a prescription it is hard for the government to say no), and then only for curbside pickup. See here for example: https:/&#x2F

More ›