Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
kkapelon
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
24 ms
·
271.
▲
by
kkapelon
9y ago
Usually you don't use maven deps directly. You have a registry in your company that caches maven packages for you and runs vulnerability scans on the binary. So the binaries you end up using are "tested" internally. Is that h
272.
▲
by
kkapelon
9y ago
> Jenkins: Nobody likes Jenkins, apparently. That is not a good reason for not using Jenkins. You should try to see if it covers your needs and if it does, you should not care about what other people think about it. Also you can discover
273.
▲
by
kkapelon
9y ago
Very Nice! I did something similar but only for hosted solutions http://blog.codepipes.com/hosted-ci-comparison/hosted-ci-com... I am preparing another blog post for on-premise (GoCD, Jenkins, Concourse etc.)
274.
▲
by
kkapelon
9y ago
Because Github wants to be app store. See https://github.com/marketplace Instead of creating a solution for themselves they will take 30% from all other solutions
275.
▲
by
kkapelon
9y ago
Interesting article but I think the number of projects (100) is very low for valid conclusions. If you have already automated the process maybe you should try adding more projects. >Unit Testing Appears to Make Complexity and Method Leng
276.
▲
Spinnaker is not a Build Server (and other misconceptions)
(blog.armory.io)
3 points
by
kkapelon
9y ago
|
0 comments
277.
▲
by
kkapelon
9y ago
>Make is well on its own, especially for everything that is not portable C Do you have examples of non trivial projects that use only Makefiles and nothing else as a build system?
278.
▲
by
kkapelon
9y ago
>When I look at a tool like Gulp, I wonder if its success is largely attributable to people not bothering to learn how Makefiles work I have. And then I learned that I also need autoconf/automake/m4 (which the author is not men
279.
▲
by
kkapelon
9y ago
>The integration of Travis with GitHub runs deep At the moment there are 10+ companies that do the exact same thing. http://blog.codepipes.com/hosted-ci-comparison/hosted-ci-com... If you don't have time to cli
280.
▲
by
kkapelon
9y ago
An even simpler solution is to use github pages. So no CI needed at all. You push your changes and Github is doing all the work on its own. You get the final result as html. No ssh keys, no circle CI, no environment variables. Just git push
281.
▲
Leaving Scala After Six Years of Development
(soc.github.io)
6 points
by
kkapelon
9y ago
|
0 comments
282.
▲
by
kkapelon
10y ago
Here is how your sentence sounds like: I never ever need [to run standard Docker commands that work everywhere]. Usually process is a bit different [than using the standard Docker commands that work everywhere]. Wrecker [does something that
283.
▲
by
kkapelon
10y ago
Worst name ever. It will be very hard for people to search about this (not to mention the SEO problems)
284.
▲
by
kkapelon
10y ago
Who says that O1 is single entry? I do not believe this to be the case.
285.
▲
by
kkapelon
10y ago
Are you joking? Wercker has the worst Docker integration ever! In most other hosted CI services you can run plain Docker commands. But not with Wercker! They even mention it in the docs: http://devcenter.wercker.com/docs
286.
▲
by
kkapelon
10y ago
Hosted CI like Travis, Codeship, SemaphoreCI etc.
287.
▲
by
kkapelon
10y ago
If you are on Java this mega comparison might help. http://blog.codepipes.com/hosted-ci-comparison/hosted-ci-com...
288.
▲
by
kkapelon
10y ago
This does not surprise me. Wercker was the most complex CI solution I tested and without good documentation. This allows for a lot of consulting opportunities for Oracle. http://blog.codepipes.com/hosted-ci-comparison/h
289.
▲
by
kkapelon
10y ago
Can somebody compare this to Gradle? I mean somebody who has actually used both of them (and not read some versus blog posts).
290.
▲
by
kkapelon
10y ago
The title clearly starts with "unit testing".
291.
▲
by
kkapelon
10y ago
If you have a spec that changes by the _day_ = it means you don't have a spec. You are still prototyping. So yes, start writing unit tests when you no longer prototype.
292.
▲
by
kkapelon
10y ago
So the tax preparation company was still in the initial stages? It isn't clear in your article.
293.
▲
by
kkapelon
10y ago
Effective UI tests use the page pattern and should be resilient against minor UI changes. https://martinfowler.com/bliki/PageObject.html There are several testing tools that support this pattern.
294.
▲
by
kkapelon
10y ago
I can't believe that in 2017 we still need to discuss if the benefits of tests outweigh their costs. Anyway, the article seems like a brain-storming session from the author, so I am not sure that I need to answer all the points. Those
295.
▲
Mega comparison of 12 hosted Continuous integration products
(blog.codepipes.com)
2 points
by
kkapelon
10y ago
|
0 comments
296.
▲
by
kkapelon
10y ago
The name clashes with a well known anime movie, which also uses CGI. Maybe change the name of this engine?
297.
▲
by
kkapelon
10y ago
High Caliber Mobile Battleship
298.
▲
by
kkapelon
10y ago
Human Controlled Missile Bomber
299.
▲
by
kkapelon
10y ago
Let's say that I am a pharma company. Q. Don't you share this data over networks from time to time? A. Hell no. Q. Is all your data siloed and bolted down to one place never to move anywhere A. Yes that is the plan actually. Q. Ho
300.
▲
by
kkapelon
10y ago
The article does not address important topics such as privacy and security. For some organizations using a private cloud is not a technical decision but instead a political/ethics one. As an example I would bet that there are several c
More ›