kkapelon

5 ms·

1.
by kkapelon 11d ago
People who want a VR system that runs Linux
2.
by kkapelon 11d ago
You can buy a pocket sized steam deck and do it yourself https://armadaos.dev/ Or use gamenative on your phone
3.
by kkapelon 11d ago
You could already do that with gamenative. There are many videos. Also you can run steam os on arm portables. https://armadaos.dev/ So all this was possible before the Steam frame was launched
4.
by kkapelon 11d ago
Xreal or Viture
5.
by kkapelon 17d ago
Either testing for something bigger OR demonstrating their power to a 3rd party with minimal real disruption
6.
by kkapelon 17d ago
I am also using termux and moshi and at least with moshi everything works out of the box. Where does it get clunky? What functionality is missing?
7.
by kkapelon 17d ago
How many other products can you name that: 1) are terminal based (not gui apps that you need to install) 2) Can be run by mosh/ssh 3) Track agent sessions automatically 4) Have built-in git worktree management 5) Show agents connection
8.
by kkapelon 17d ago
> Their connectivity product is unique There is also netbird, netmaker, zerotier and several others.
9.
by kkapelon 17d ago
source?link?
10.
by kkapelon 29d ago
You are lucky that you got valid PRs that actually fix something. I got PRs that either never worked or even broke stuff https://blog.codepipes.com/llms/your-pr-was-rejected.html
11.
by kkapelon 2mo ago
Strictly from personal opinion 1) Built-in sub agents assume you use a single AI agent. Some people use multiple, so they need separate terminals/processes by definition. Even if you use the same agent sometimes you have different secu
12.
by kkapelon 2mo ago
Not sure I understand your question. You literally asked, "WHAT is it that makes herdr et al so popular"? Why? Because it has more/better features. Or you mean something else? Specifically against cmux, it is not Macosonly. S
13.
by kkapelon 2mo ago
Simplest setup would be just plain ssh/mosh. Nothing more exotic. I have seen moshi.app but haven't tested it yet.
14.
by kkapelon 2mo ago
https://herdr.dev/compare/
15.
by kkapelon 2mo ago
https://herdr.dev/compare/
16.
by kkapelon 2mo ago
I am not familiar with all the tools you listed so please correct me if i am wrong, but all these will catch stuff that LLMs can potentially catch as well (if configured correctly). They will not handle any architectural problems (i.e. this
17.
by kkapelon 2mo ago
> Once you do all that the PR process is pointless manual PR reviews can catch things that llms currently miss. Examples are duplicated code, lack of unit tests or introducing security issues. None of these really break the build. So jus
18.
by kkapelon 3mo ago
tmux and zellij are compared here https://herdr.dev/compare/
19.
by kkapelon 3mo ago
There is a whole page just on this subject https://herdr.dev/compare/
20.
by kkapelon 3mo ago
There is a whole page about this https://herdr.dev/compare/ For me the killer feature is the git worktree management. But in essence it is tmux on steroid (Specifically for agents)
21.
by kkapelon 3mo ago
You missed the most important one. Automatic git worktree management. So that different agents don't clash with each other.
22.
by kkapelon 3mo ago
Because of lot of AI PRs come from first time contributors who just discovered the tools. Maybe their PR is amazing, maybe it is trash. You never know until you review it.
23.
by kkapelon 3mo ago
What exactly does rac validate do? How is it deterministic? Is there an example somewhere?
24.
by kkapelon 3mo ago
The goal posts keep moving. First iroh was marketed as "solves communication behind NAT". Then we went to application level NAT busting vs node level NAT busting. Then we went to distributed vs client-server, then we went to stabl
25.
by kkapelon 3mo ago
They don't need to be https://tailscale.com/docs/features/tailscale-funnel For this simple scenario (just exposing your laptop to a public IP) there are already a gazillion alternatives (e.g. ngrok)
26.
by kkapelon 3mo ago
They do if you use tailscale and friends
27.
by kkapelon 3mo ago
but if I am shipping a video conferencing application (where I control both the client and the server) I don't need nat traversal anymore. My clients will have outgoing connections to whichever co-ordination server I choose. Tailscale
28.
by kkapelon 3mo ago
but what exactly is the use case? I was responding to the nat traversal topic.. If I wanted to share something internal with a friend I would use ngrok or any of the million alternatives. Anyway, this is exactly why my top-level comment say
29.
by kkapelon 3mo ago
Like https://tailscale.com/docs/features/tsnet ?
30.
by kkapelon 3mo ago
Congrats on shipping You need urgently a "versus" page that talks about tailscale/netbird/netmaker/zerotier/twingate/openziti Looking at the use cases, right now I don't see anything that cannot be do

More ›