4 ms·
They don't need to be https://tailscale.com/docs/features/tailscale-funnel https://tailscale.com/docs/features/tailscale-funnel For this simple scenario (just
by kkapelon 4mo ago
They don't need to be https://tailscale.com/docs/features/tailscale-funnel https://tailscale.com/docs/features/tailscale-funnel
For this simple scenario (just exposing your laptop to a public IP) there are already a gazillion alternatives (e.g. ngrok)
- ben-schaaf 4mo agoFunneling means opening up the device for the entire internet to access, not just to those with my public key like in iroh. It's limited to 3 ports. It requires setup for each device. It's not peer-to-peer. It has throttled bandwidth. No, this does not do the same thing as iroh. Not even close.
- kkapelon 4mo agoThe goal posts keep moving. First iroh was marketed as "solves communication behind NAT". Then we went to application level NAT busting vs node level NAT busting. Then we went to distributed vs client-server, then we went to stable IPs for non-server devices (your original comment). Now we moved to "true peer to peer" and "public keys". This just tells me that the marketing site doesn't explain what Iroh actually does. The fact that so many other people (apart from me) asked about the connection to Tailscale is also interesting.