kjshsh123

5 ms·

1.
by kjshsh123 16d ago
Humans sometimes don't remember things 100%. LLMs can produce certain text and be run deterministically. I don't really understand this side of the debate other than as a gotcha tbh. If LLM use atrophies your brain and skills that
2.
by kjshsh123 21d ago
On a purely monetary basis it probably never will. You're competing against companies that get tax breaks, locate themselves optimally, and have large economies of scale. Also, if it did, the hardware would be bought up, raising the pr
3.
by kjshsh123 24d ago
Like other comments on OP have pointed out, the term at this point is vague and used for various reasons. But given the term's emergence in a country with a communist government, and the origin described by wikipedia, I think what I&#x
4.
by kjshsh123 24d ago
I'm not saying workers aren't necessarily overworked etc. I'm just saying that's not what this word and concept is about. This concept is about capital owners.
5.
by kjshsh123 24d ago
We are all consumers.
6.
by kjshsh123 24d ago
Yes, for capital owners.
7.
by kjshsh123 25d ago
>When capital owners are driven by competition they must work increasingly more for little or no marginal gain despite falling prices for consumers so price fixing or 'price leadership' becomes impossible. A lot of the people i
8.
by kjshsh123 29d ago
It's funny seeing this when I was going to mention runebench https://maxbittker.github.io/runebench/
9.
by kjshsh123 1mo ago
On further thought, I think the author's intent was to say that classic RNNs have "unbounded temporal accumulation in the hidden state".
10.
by kjshsh123 1mo ago
>In contrast to a classic RNN, there's no unbounded hidden state accumulating across an entire trajectory I don' understand this line. In a classic RNN hidden state is bounded dimension. In fact it's transformers that te
11.
by kjshsh123 1mo ago
Land value tax would solve this.
12.
by kjshsh123 2mo ago
Could probably make a 1B model that removes watermarks. Chooses synonyms, trains on user style, changes order around etc.
13.
Supply and Demand Is Not What Most People Think(shonczinner.substack.com)
2 points by kjshsh123 2mo ago|0 comments
14.
by kjshsh123 3mo ago
He's not dead, but it is bad to gossip regardless.
15.
Our Straussian Technocracy(libertiesjournal.com)
1 points by kjshsh123 3mo ago|0 comments
16.
by kjshsh123 3mo ago
Like I said, these are negative internalities. I don't think most users care about these negative impacts on themselves.
17.
by kjshsh123 3mo ago
Most countries don't allow billionaires to influence elections like the USA. Maybe they still do in other ways. Anyway, I think blaming the 0.01% for how 50%+1 vote is too easy. Take electoral reform. Is that the 0.01%, or is the case
18.
by kjshsh123 3mo ago
Social media won because it's better for the consumer and producer. For the producer, it's free infrastructure but it's also advertising. Having a large subreddit means your game getting recommended to others and potentially
19.
by kjshsh123 3mo ago
>If you genuinely believe something others don’t, that’s not a debate to win. That’s an edge. The market rewards being right in a way that no argument ever will. Instead of persuading the skeptic, ship the thing they think is wrong and l
20.
by kjshsh123 3mo ago
That sounds like mistaken optimism due to a mistaken interpretation of the invisible hand. Mandating age verification and the inevitable implementation requirements are bad for freedom. Behaviour changes and innovations will mitigate some o
21.
Neural Cellular Automata and Recurrent Architectures(shonczinner.github.io)
3 points by kjshsh123 4mo ago|0 comments
22.
by kjshsh123 4mo ago
It's only a matter of time before nootropics forums start experimenting with these drugs... These drugs seem to change something fundamental that reduces problematic behavior.
23.
by kjshsh123 4mo ago
>The Alchian–Allen effect was described in 1964 by Armen Alchian and William R Allen in the book University Economics (now called Exchange and Production[1]). It states that when the prices of two substitute goods, such as high and low g
24.
by kjshsh123 4mo ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consumption_%28economics%29?wp... >Thus no matter what your productive output is per hour of labour, you will always work as much as you can, because you are - presumably - insatiably d
25.
by kjshsh123 4mo ago
The person I replied to was trying to separate necessities from consumption in the "traditional sense of the word". No doubt there's problematic regulations like exclusionary zoning laws. But you can't say that these reg
26.
by kjshsh123 4mo ago
That's not a distortion, that's just what the choice is. When a new gaming console comes out and someone works extra shifts to afford it sooner, that's not a distortion. I think your mistake, based on how you're talking
27.
by kjshsh123 4mo ago
Necessities count as consumption. You could survive off rice and live in an internet cafe for $15/night. I don't know what you think the traditional sense of the word "consumption" is.
28.
by kjshsh123 4mo ago
I don't really. It smells to me like the lump of labor fallacy. Labor participation results from supply and demand and it going down does not necessarily indicate less demand, but can also indicate less supply. That's what you&#x2
29.
by kjshsh123 4mo ago
Labor is not a market distortion and average wages not following average productivity is not evidence that it is. In a competitive market, wages should follow marginal productivity. Probably what happened is America was in an increasing
30.
by kjshsh123 4mo ago
But you can transfer your ownership.

More ›