kj65557

7 ms·

1.
by kj65557 9y ago
No need for ad hominem attacks. You make no rebuttals to the points made by the comment above and just dismiss it as PR. Just because something is (or isn't) PR doesn't mean that it's false.
2.
by kj65557 9y ago
I agree with the fundamental protections provided by privacy act legislation, but I'm concerned that the cost of compliance (hiring people to respond to every gdpr request, for example) prevents startups and smaller companies from comp
3.
by kj65557 9y ago
It's really hard to imagine this will be good for anyone except airlines.
4.
by kj65557 9y ago
If you have suggestions for other places to work let me know
5.
by kj65557 9y ago
I've wondered about getting a degree in aerospace...
6.
by kj65557 9y ago
That's true. I'm still new to this org so things might change
7.
by kj65557 9y ago
Fixed, thanks
8.
by kj65557 9y ago
I see what you mean, but getting approval to make changes is challenging in this particular department.
9.
by kj65557 9y ago
And recommendations for advisors?
10.
by kj65557 9y ago
FlumeJava/Spanner/Stubby Services, mostly in payments
11.
by kj65557 9y ago
How so?
12.
by kj65557 9y ago
There might be some possibility for leadership but otherwise it's all CRUD operations and the complexity is in the business, not the tech.
13.
Ask HN: Is it time to leave Google?
51 points by kj65557 9y ago|46 comments
14.
by kj65557 9y ago
(also work for google) It is pretty easy to delete your account on many social networks. The following support deletion: * Google (all account data) * Facebook (all account data except messages that others have received) * Reddit * Instagra
15.
by kj65557 9y ago
I hate to break it to you, but many planes are flown by one pilot- Even some small jets are certified for this and it happens all the time... Possibly above your house.
16.
by kj65557 9y ago
They don't specify the type of plane used. Some require two, some require only one. If it was the type that requires two, then yes, it was unsafe.
17.
by kj65557 9y ago
If they were flying planes not certified for single pilot operation, I'd completely agree with you. However that would be problematic under both part 91 and part 135. If their actions were completely legal under part 91 and friends&#
18.
by kj65557 9y ago
I'm long time HN news lurker and student pilot. My only conflict of interest is that I find the FAA a pain in the ass (and seeing this article encouraged me to finally post something). I didn't even know about TapJets until yester
19.
by kj65557 9y ago
Thanks for the correction on part 135 vs 131. I see your point but a perfect safety record doesn't preclude overreacting to fairly minor infractions. I would be interested to know exactly what model of plane they we're flying with
20.
by kj65557 9y ago
> newly-registered probable-sockpuppet account any day. Thanks for your response but my tenure on hn is probably the least relevant part of the discussion.
21.
by kj65557 9y ago
There is no safety concern here, it's purely bureaucratic and political. Many GA planes are 100% legal and safe to be flown with one pilot. The question here is whether or not this was a commercial (part 91) operation or a charter (par