kingkongrevenge

7 ms·

1.
by kingkongrevenge 17y ago
> These days, when talk turns to the supposed genetic differences in the intelligence of certain races, Southern Italians have disappeared from the discussion. Not been to the guido hood lately?
2.
by kingkongrevenge 17y ago
> every one of those studies found greater longevity and fewer lifestyle diseases in endurance athletes than in speed or power athletes. Do share. I hope you know what I mean by observational and understand how it's a worthless way to d
3.
by kingkongrevenge 17y ago
Your studies are all observational garbage, as were the two links I posted, more to make a point than anything. And they both did in fact raise questions about damage caused by distance training. They just couched their language with p
4.
by kingkongrevenge 17y ago
The link is worthless. Some researchers say runners live long ... because their model says runners live long. Tautology. Why didn't they just look at dead olympic athletes? That would be an interesting and potentially worthwhile study.
5.
by kingkongrevenge 17y ago
> 41 percent less likely to suffer from high blood pressure Compared to whom? Serious racquet sport competitors? Power lifters? No, compared to couch potatoes with lousy diets. Well no shit. That's not the point.
6.
by kingkongrevenge 17y ago
I don't think coffee is technically a bean. It's the pit of a fruit. Anyway, it has no calories. Cavemen almost certainly drank various teas. It's very important with the paleo stuff not get caught up in what I've seen aptly described as
7.
by kingkongrevenge 17y ago
A pork chop and some carrots. There's nothing complicated about it. You can do OK at grocery store buffets, actually.
8.
by kingkongrevenge 17y ago
Top ten reasons not to run marathons: http://www.arthurdevany.com/2005/08/top_ten_reasons.html
9.
by kingkongrevenge 17y ago
I'm afraid you are trying to mislead. No, a large pool of undocumented mexican labor was not coming to the US to live and work. Not until the late 40s, anyway. Then the problem was solved until the late sixties. Talking about the ease of
10.
by kingkongrevenge 17y ago
http://imgur.com/uyIxQ There you go, wiseguy.
11.
by kingkongrevenge 17y ago
It's true I've never been fat, but the changes in my health and body composition as I shifted to eating this way were undeniable. Likewise my health also improved as I phased out a distance biking habit in favor of short, hard lifting rout
12.
by kingkongrevenge 17y ago
I wouldn't say "no coffee" is a paleo thing. Also, I would say experiment with dairy. Dairy makes me feel great. Full fat yogurt is a fantastically cheap and healthy central component to a meal if it agrees with you (I think ethnicity is
13.
by kingkongrevenge 17y ago
This trumps absolutely anything else you can do: avoid starch and sugar. Eat only meat/fish, vegetables, and fruit. Simply don't eat sugary drinks, cereal, oatmeal, rice, potatoes, bread and so forth. This way everything you eat is nutri
14.
by kingkongrevenge 17y ago
In the case of Japan we're talking about a lot of Chinese and Koreans who do in fact speak Japanese.
15.
by kingkongrevenge 17y ago
Japan did a big immigration enforcement round up last year as the economy slowed and shipped a lot of people out. They seem ok.
16.
by kingkongrevenge 17y ago
Funny how there wasn't an illegal alien problem up through the 60s. Wonder how they managed that if it's impossible. People's attempt make this about a physical wall is absurd. It's not about a wall. It's about many measures. Also, it i
17.
by kingkongrevenge 17y ago
I hope you just wanted to turn a phrase and can actually see how facile that is.
18.
by kingkongrevenge 17y ago
What would Mexico or China do about it? Nothing. Be realistic. The US still comes from a position of strength (for now). > Have nanotech magic-growth fences been invented and I didn't notice? The border was fairly tight for most of U
19.
by kingkongrevenge 17y ago
> send every single California farm into bankruptcy? Bollocks. You're repeating industry propaganda. Some farms on the margin may go, but so what. How about silicon valley takes a hiatus from frivolous social apps and make some good f
20.
by kingkongrevenge 17y ago
I am explaining to you that you are trying to call a steak a cake. The biological nature of your preference is irrelevant. You want to redefine marriage, but by the current definition there is no inequality. You are as free to marry as an
21.
by kingkongrevenge 17y ago
It's a cent or two on the dollar to task the existing police and federal apparatus vs pay out the social benefits the typical illegal alien consumes.
22.
by kingkongrevenge 17y ago
It is totally feasible. Ike did it in the 50s, right before he fired the whole border patrol and immigration control apparatus and reformed it. It would be very cheap right now because there is a lot of idle shipping. You load the illegal
23.
by kingkongrevenge 17y ago
> express my love through marriage You can express your love through marriage: marry a woman. "Homosexual marriage" is an oxymoron. To the extent heterosexual marriage gets special legal benefits over other partnerships, I'm in favor o
24.
by kingkongrevenge 17y ago
What about deporting all the illegals? That would be far the most fiscally effective solution.
25.
by kingkongrevenge 17y ago
> if you don't use it all the time It's core to the language; very common usage. Context overloading is very core to the language. I don't know what kind of programming you could do that wouldn't involved references used in this way.
26.
by kingkongrevenge 17y ago
> push @{$xs->[3]}, 6 # omgwtf?! Maybe the first time you see it, for at most two minutes once in your entire life. I kind of wonder if the people who freak out about this syntax stuff have ever studied a foreign language. Do they
27.
by kingkongrevenge 17y ago
> watching Perl 6 try so hard to kill [perl5]. I see no basis for this interpretation. Perl 6 has not been detrimental to Perl 5. Perl 5 and its ecosystem has remained perfectly competitive with all relevant alternatives. What was su
28.
by kingkongrevenge 17y ago
Python 3 is not very ambitious. It's not comparable.
29.
by kingkongrevenge 17y ago
> "race" and ancestry are not directly related Of course they are.
30.
by kingkongrevenge 17y ago
Races are extended families. People in a race are genetically and genealogically closer to each other than to people outside of it. This racial clustering of relatedness is empirically testable. Race is not a social construct.

More ›