kimseungyong

4 ms·

1.
by kimseungyong 19d ago
I've thought of ideas like this too I still can't believe that an LLM can maintain all major service domains as documents If too many documents are submitted, it will be hard to review, and if the domain is incorrectly set without
2.
by kimseungyong 21d ago
AI operates on the device. AI model vendors will likely be torn between developing their own hardware to avoid hardware dependency or moving forward together. Quietly, Apple and Google will take advantage of this trend.
3.
by kimseungyong 22d ago
Anyway, AI operates on top of the device. Among devices worldwide, who has the most control? Apple They don’t build AI themselves, but when it comes to device infrastructure that allows AI to operate, Apple is naturally the strongest Just a
4.
by kimseungyong 23d ago
The problem is that, as seen in the case of the Houthi rebels developing missile software using Claude Code, AI has lowered the very threshold at which human cruelty or selfishness can be put into practice. Anthropic’s safeguards were appli
5.
by kimseungyong 25d ago
Honestly, I don’t really know much about lenses, wide-angle lenses, apertures, and things like that Just open the camera app and take a picture In everyday life, I hardly ever zoom in to take pictures Because of this, I can’t see any reason
6.
by kimseungyong 27d ago
I was waiting for the standard iPhone, so it’s a shame it’s coming out next year. Unless you’re using photos or videos like an expert, there doesn’t seem to be any reason to go for a heavy Pro anymore. Since last year’s promotional display
7.
by kimseungyong 27d ago
Finally, the foldable iPhone is out It’s too expensive for me to even dare to have, but I do want to use it But if there’s no particular improvement in the user experience, I would prefer the base model of the iPhone 18 coming out next year
8.
by kimseungyong 28d ago
How about this idea? We all know that Meta is a company that makes money off personal data anyway Meta should be honest, stop selling this to users for money, and instead pay users to buy the information If you subscribe, you get paid; if y
9.
by kimseungyong 1mo ago
I like the idea. To avoid losing context, I mainly conduct the planning session and the implementation session separately. From the standpoint of building enterprise products, what worries me most is whether the agent we are implementing ma
10.
by kimseungyong 1mo ago
Yeah I agree. I used Fable 5.1 again and my token 30% suddenly gone. I usually develop with superpowers planing. And 30% is disappeared with only planning. I turned back to Opus directly
11.
by kimseungyong 1mo ago
The management has to prove the results of adopting AI It seems there is a structural problem, since practitioners have to take responsibility when AI makes mistakes. The best thing should be happened is that AI practically helps with the t
12.
by kimseungyong 1mo ago
Fable is too expensive for general use I think this is why it hasn’t received as much attention as expected since Fable came out Developers always work while trying to find ways to work continuously for a 5-hour session without disconnectin
13.
by kimseungyong 1mo ago
I completely agree. At the early stage of service development I was recently in charge of Judging that this service will clearly continue to be domain-advanced I have refactored everything using DDD patterns. And as expected, the service ru
14.
by kimseungyong 1mo ago
Who is better? AWS? Google? MS?