kiitos

23 ms·

361.
by kiitos 1y ago
This claim is pretty over-blown. > we created a simple issue asking for 'author recognition', to prompt inject the agent into leaking data about the user's GitHub account ... What can I say ... this was all it needed This
362.
by kiitos 1y ago
You're suggesting the quality of a car is a function of the quality of its constituent parts. That's not the case. Quality is a function of those things, but also and more importantly the processes by which the car is assembled, a
363.
by kiitos 1y ago
Regulation-compliance is kind of a requirement for, well, everything, stablecoin or otherwise, so not really sure what the point is here...
364.
by kiitos 1y ago
You tell me. I sincerely doubt it would make any meaningful difference.
365.
by kiitos 1y ago
It is misleading to say that "all brands are using the same suppliers" and straight up false to say that they're using "the same processes", especially in the context of German cars (I'm referring to all German
366.
by kiitos 1y ago
There are some Fords and Teslas on the roads in Germany, yes. But percentage-wise they're not really significant. https://www.statista.com/statistics/815073/new-registrations... is one reference among many.
367.
by kiitos 1y ago
> The U.S., for instance, has a 2.5 percent tariff on cars imported from Germany, while Germany has a ten percent tariff on American cars. In addition, Germany’s value-added tax is remitted on exports but charged on imports. As a result,
368.
by kiitos 1y ago
In short, that's the job of the software/tooling/LLM to figure out, not the job of the user to specify. The user doesn't know what the context needs to be, if they did and could specify it then they probably don't n
369.
by kiitos 1y ago
I'm talking about situations where the user wants to ask questions about data that's many orders of magnitude larger than what can be included in any LLM request context. I just provide access to the data (via MCP server, RAG serv
370.
by kiitos 1y ago
> In my view, we hand craft the context and then the LLM makes the deductions. We (as in users) provide the source material and our questions, the LLM provides the answers. The entire concept of a context is incidental complexity resulti
371.
by kiitos 1y ago
> I believe we should be "pushing" context to the models rather than giving them directions on how to "pull" the context themselves. Models have very very very limited capacity for context, it's one of their prim
372.
by kiitos 1y ago
> the expense of hollowing out domestic industry > Post WW2, US leadership [deliberately] traded the domestic manufacturing industry [capability] for national security, by making the US dollar the default international trade currency
373.
by kiitos 1y ago
The 1800s called and they want their moral standards back.
374.
by kiitos 1y ago
Sorry, the question was actually rhetorical: those glyphs are in no way obscure, they're super common. A text isn't monospaced or not, a text is just a text, monospaced is a property of a typeface that can be used to render a text
375.
by kiitos 1y ago
[flagged]
376.
by kiitos 1y ago
...for PHP projects
377.
by kiitos 1y ago
I have a WAF that blocks everything. It's obviously fundamentally broken, but in terms of product metrics like impact, it's incredible! It stops 100% of attacks!
378.
by kiitos 1y ago
[flagged]
379.
by kiitos 1y ago
[flagged]
380.
by kiitos 1y ago
Sure, but the impact of new customers and their decisions take a long time before they impact net statistics. All evidence I can find, regardless of domain or context, suggests Redis vs. valkey marketshare is something around a 99%/1%
381.
by kiitos 1y ago
AWS and GCP offer valkey-based versions of products that are typically based on Redis, but those versions are currently, generally, preview-grade, and statistically zero customers are using them. They still offer the original, Redis-based v
382.
by kiitos 1y ago
Statistically nobody is using valkey.
383.
by kiitos 1y ago
What do you think are "random obscure glyphs"? Is the Turkish lowercase 'i' (ı) one of them? What about the German Eszett (ß)? Is 'ö' a random obscure glyph? What about 'ø'?
384.
by kiitos 1y ago
Why is the ability to comment-out entire sections of a config file a primary use case? What are the motivating requirements for this feature? That aside, you don't need semantically-meaningful indentation to support commenting-out whol
385.
by kiitos 1y ago
I'd default to CategoryID being a string, with uniqueness constraints defined on the categories table. And UnitPrice to be a composite type, containing a [u]int amount and a string denomination, e.g. `10000 USD_CENT` or something like
386.
by kiitos 1y ago
You and a LLM can guess at what the types might be, but those guesses are a suggestion that a human needs to evaluate, they're not something you can just pass thru as assumptive defaults. In your link, for example, I would definitely
387.
by kiitos 1y ago
Your description of "normal load balancing" is certainly one way to do load balancing, but in no way is it the presumptive default. Keeping session data in a shared source of truth like a KV store or DB, and expecting (stateless)
388.
by kiitos 1y ago
Huh, weird stuff! Your linked image shows what appear to be tables, and the little arrows appear to represent entity-relationships between them. But I'm not sure how you'd get useful DDL out of it -- none of the columns have types
389.
by kiitos 1y ago
"A picture of a schema"? What does this mean? And by SQL do you mean DDL?
390.
by kiitos 1y ago
> CONL uses indentation for structure. Oops.

More ›