khalic

15 ms·

481.
by khalic 1y ago
Your point being? We can’t treat different content differently? Do you not agree this is insane content?
482.
by khalic 1y ago
I don’t mean that I agree with the concept of corporate power abuse or the hypothesized source of the pressure. But I’m not spending one second of my life protecting this kind of content, and the fact that it’s being euphemistically called
483.
by khalic 1y ago
If I had a business, I wouldn’t touch that kind of media with a ten foot pole. Why should these be forced to provide their service?
484.
by khalic 1y ago
Not sure what side this argument serves
485.
by khalic 1y ago
Removing incest games is not a burden to society
486.
by khalic 1y ago
So you disagree that these games are disgusting?
487.
by khalic 1y ago
I think some are really afraid of the fabled slippery slope, but yeah, the gaming world is home to a very dubious bread of pro CP, sex obsessed (as in “every media I consume must make me horny”) and misogynistic punks. Edit: not making any
488.
by khalic 1y ago
Public announcement are in no way bound by truth, terms of service are, to a degree
489.
by khalic 1y ago
A lot of unrigorous claims for an abstract…
490.
by khalic 1y ago
Before getting all worked up, I would advise people to look at what games exactly were banned, and see if it’s a case of power abuse or simply a case of “we can all agree that rape and incest games are disgusting and have no place in an ent
491.
by khalic 1y ago
Are you kidding me? 500MB? And it’s that coherent?
492.
by khalic 1y ago
I think that annoying positivity is rubbing off on me too, aggravating but welcome
493.
by khalic 1y ago
RIP PBS
494.
by khalic 1y ago
I really hope Europe has made some plans and put some money on the side for the second american brain drain of this century…
495.
by khalic 1y ago
Thank you very much my dear, he seems to have a way with words, his last post about context summarizes many concepts I have internalized but not formalized yet.
496.
by khalic 1y ago
What a didactic and well built article! My thanks to the author
497.
by khalic 1y ago
Thanks for the explanation, makes sense, that damn frame of reference always gets me. I’ll take a deep breath and ignore/report next time.
498.
by khalic 1y ago
Alright, note taken, I’ll be more careful
499.
by khalic 1y ago
Only if you ignore his insults
500.
by khalic 1y ago
Well there’s an ugly website :D
501.
by khalic 1y ago
So his insults are ok but not my pushback? Defending bullies is certainly a choice…
502.
by khalic 1y ago
If you were having a Claude code session, it will know the context from the discussion.
503.
by khalic 1y ago
I’m from the old guard, I get where you’re coming from. The thing is when I find a prompt that works well, I can reuse it, build on it, create new rules, all in natural language. Give it a try it’s kind of impressive It’s definitely a new s
504.
by khalic 1y ago
So no, maybe give it a try before talking about it? You know, having an informed opinion and all…
505.
by khalic 1y ago
Depends, I have a prompt ready for changes I made manually, that checks the diff, gets the context, spits a conventional commit with a summary of the changes, I check, correct if needed and add the ticket number. It’s faster because it type
506.
by khalic 1y ago
Have you tried?
507.
by khalic 1y ago
[flagged]
508.
by khalic 1y ago
Then ask it to write the commit differently, or you can explain why in the prompt. Edit: I start by creating the ticket with Claude+terminal tool, the title and descriptions gives context info to the llm, then we do the task, then commit an
509.
by khalic 1y ago
How about you find out for yourself? Keep a chat window or an agent open and ask it how it could help with your tasks. My git messages and gitlab tickets are being written by AI for a year now, way better than anything I would half heartedl
510.
by khalic 1y ago
Yeah it really helps knowing CSS when doing frontend dev...

More ›