Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
khalic
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
3 ms
·
1.
▲
by
khalic
6d ago
I didn’t know about that method, thank you. I’ve needed a local model for security research but Qwen 27b abliterated did 30% worse than the stock weights on my internal benchmarks (I just skip the public benches now, it’s honestly useless n
2.
▲
by
khalic
6d ago
You know you can just concede and not resort to ad-hominems out of spite right? Anyway, goodbye
3.
▲
by
khalic
6d ago
It will become an issue one day for sure
4.
▲
by
khalic
6d ago
Language please, and no, I’m being appropriately technical and nuanced for the subject on HN. It’s a tech forum, I expect a little CS know how from the reader. Like knowing that gaining control to a few evaluation harness clusters is nowher
5.
▲
by
khalic
6d ago
> being shot with a modern laminated bow (36 lbs) on a complete uneviscerated carcass of a small ungulate hung in anatomical position in order to start documenting impact breakage and microscopic linear impact traces for the shape and ra
6.
▲
by
khalic
6d ago
I’ll concede that I could have been clearer. Maybe we have conflicting definitions of “taking control”
7.
▲
by
khalic
6d ago
I’m not saying it’s impossible, I’m saying it’s not the case, _yet_
8.
▲
by
khalic
6d ago
None of that means they gained access to the inference infrastructure or locked out the admins, which would be required for a takeover.
9.
▲
by
khalic
6d ago
The agents compromised an internal Kubernetes research cluster dedicated to orchestrating evaluation sandboxes and virtual machine environments, _not_ OpenAI's production inference infrastructure or the GPU clusters hosting core model
10.
▲
by
khalic
6d ago
Yeah cause there are so many training facilities sitting around just waiting for someone to take over, nobody would notice a 100k server data centre going off rails
11.
▲
by
khalic
6d ago
You’re falling for the buzzword salad articles. They didn’t “take control” of anything, they just ran stuff with OpenAI allegedly not noticing
12.
▲
by
khalic
10d ago
The fact that it requires a user action to initiate is better than the previous solution, but that's a pretty low bar to have
13.
▲
by
khalic
10d ago
Sorry, corrected
14.
▲
by
khalic
10d ago
edit: removed, didn’t properly read the context
15.
▲
by
khalic
12d ago
2030 lol
16.
▲
by
khalic
12d ago
Oh my favorite typo, you can never go wrong with a little rouge
17.
▲
by
khalic
12d ago
I'm going to spend so much time on this website, very good work
18.
▲
by
khalic
12d ago
Comment got flagged and deleted, guess you were not just wrong, but extra wrong ;-)
19.
▲
by
khalic
13d ago
I've been using homebrew for so long, I can't tell you how much it has helped me to spend more hours developing and less managing packages and updates, etc. Thank you so much, congratulations on the update!
20.
▲
by
khalic
14d ago
1. Not a tangent, it’s related to the very first content visible on that link. 2. Not a dismissal, an advise from an expert 3. Not complaining, as stated, giving an advise about the optics of using clear LLM prose on the first paragraph
21.
▲
by
khalic
15d ago
I strongly recommend the authors rewrite the readme by hand. It’s kind of a snif test for how much care someone put into this project.
22.
▲
by
khalic
15d ago
yeah gonna correct to first one
23.
▲
by
khalic
15d ago
lidar = depth sensor
24.
▲
by
khalic
15d ago
300 messages and counting, and you're the first one I see making the comment. Shame on everybody here for not doing their basic due diligence of reading the fkn article before posting or reacting
25.
▲
by
khalic
15d ago
Ah, the ai panic has reached scientists, queue in the 1000s of articles about how it was about people all along and doom is coming to our civilisation because of it.
26.
▲
by
khalic
15d ago
I very much hope that apple is using lidar data to determine if it's a flat surface being screened
27.
▲
by
khalic
16d ago
I can only talk for Switzerland, but here you can’t systematically create a file on people without breaking privacy laws, this would probably qualify
28.
▲
by
khalic
16d ago
It’s probably for legal reasons
29.
▲
by
khalic
16d ago
Nobody has breached the Secure Enclave, not sure it’s doable without investing millions in direct circuit manipulation. Seems good enough
30.
▲
by
khalic
16d ago
I don’t think it bothers me, as long as the audio isn’t stored… but I can definitely see why it would bother some people. The device microphones are already always listening, this just makes use of that sound a lot more than just listening
More ›