khalic

4 ms·

1.
by khalic 2mo ago
I didn’t know about that method, thank you. I’ve needed a local model for security research but Qwen 27b abliterated did 30% worse than the stock weights on my internal benchmarks (I just skip the public benches now, it’s honestly useless n
2.
by khalic 2mo ago
You know you can just concede and not resort to ad-hominems out of spite right? Anyway, goodbye
3.
by khalic 2mo ago
It will become an issue one day for sure
4.
by khalic 2mo ago
Language please, and no, I’m being appropriately technical and nuanced for the subject on HN. It’s a tech forum, I expect a little CS know how from the reader. Like knowing that gaining control to a few evaluation harness clusters is nowher
5.
by khalic 2mo ago
> being shot with a modern laminated bow (36 lbs) on a complete uneviscerated carcass of a small ungulate hung in anatomical position in order to start documenting impact breakage and microscopic linear impact traces for the shape and ra
6.
by khalic 2mo ago
I’ll concede that I could have been clearer. Maybe we have conflicting definitions of “taking control”
7.
by khalic 2mo ago
I’m not saying it’s impossible, I’m saying it’s not the case, _yet_
8.
by khalic 2mo ago
None of that means they gained access to the inference infrastructure or locked out the admins, which would be required for a takeover.
9.
by khalic 2mo ago
The agents compromised an internal Kubernetes research cluster dedicated to orchestrating evaluation sandboxes and virtual machine environments, _not_ OpenAI's production inference infrastructure or the GPU clusters hosting core model
10.
by khalic 2mo ago
Yeah cause there are so many training facilities sitting around just waiting for someone to take over, nobody would notice a 100k server data centre going off rails
11.
by khalic 2mo ago
You’re falling for the buzzword salad articles. They didn’t “take control” of anything, they just ran stuff with OpenAI allegedly not noticing
12.
by khalic 2mo ago
The fact that it requires a user action to initiate is better than the previous solution, but that's a pretty low bar to have
13.
by khalic 2mo ago
Sorry, corrected
14.
by khalic 2mo ago
edit: removed, didn’t properly read the context
15.
by khalic 2mo ago
2030 lol
16.
by khalic 2mo ago
Oh my favorite typo, you can never go wrong with a little rouge
17.
by khalic 2mo ago
I'm going to spend so much time on this website, very good work
18.
by khalic 2mo ago
Comment got flagged and deleted, guess you were not just wrong, but extra wrong ;-)
19.
by khalic 2mo ago
I've been using homebrew for so long, I can't tell you how much it has helped me to spend more hours developing and less managing packages and updates, etc. Thank you so much, congratulations on the update!
20.
by khalic 2mo ago
1. Not a tangent, it’s related to the very first content visible on that link. 2. Not a dismissal, an advise from an expert 3. Not complaining, as stated, giving an advise about the optics of using clear LLM prose on the first paragraph
21.
by khalic 2mo ago
I strongly recommend the authors rewrite the readme by hand. It’s kind of a snif test for how much care someone put into this project.
22.
by khalic 2mo ago
yeah gonna correct to first one
23.
by khalic 2mo ago
lidar = depth sensor
24.
by khalic 2mo ago
300 messages and counting, and you're the first one I see making the comment. Shame on everybody here for not doing their basic due diligence of reading the fkn article before posting or reacting
25.
by khalic 2mo ago
Ah, the ai panic has reached scientists, queue in the 1000s of articles about how it was about people all along and doom is coming to our civilisation because of it.
26.
by khalic 2mo ago
I very much hope that apple is using lidar data to determine if it's a flat surface being screened
27.
by khalic 2mo ago
I can only talk for Switzerland, but here you can’t systematically create a file on people without breaking privacy laws, this would probably qualify
28.
by khalic 2mo ago
It’s probably for legal reasons
29.
by khalic 2mo ago
Nobody has breached the Secure Enclave, not sure it’s doable without investing millions in direct circuit manipulation. Seems good enough
30.
by khalic 2mo ago
I don’t think it bothers me, as long as the audio isn’t stored… but I can definitely see why it would bother some people. The device microphones are already always listening, this just makes use of that sound a lot more than just listening

More ›