khalic

10 ms·

271.
by khalic 6mo ago
We’ve been automating every single industry that we touched for decades without a single word, bringing up tepid responses like “it’s capitalism” or “business is business” when called out on it. But now that the time has comes for us to aut
272.
by khalic 6mo ago
Thanks for the time capsule. Boy that’s a lot of ads (live video on a computer! Wow!). The poor marijuana spider tried really hard
273.
by khalic 6mo ago
Tell this to the Allen project, Apertus Project, SmoLLM, etc, etc, etc
274.
by khalic 6mo ago
Open weight and open source are not the same
275.
by khalic 6mo ago
cries in rust interrupts
276.
by khalic 6mo ago
Yes it’s not bad, although it’s not meant to be a chatbot, post training is limited, so it won’t feel as smooth as TOTL of course. The number of supported languages is mind boggling. Focus was on open data, languages and auditability. Their
277.
by khalic 6mo ago
I can’t help but draw a connection with the numerous budget cuts from this admin, including the almost-crisis from last year with NIST.
278.
by khalic 6mo ago
Just hit my quota with 20x for the first time today…
279.
by khalic 6mo ago
Had some fun with the wireframe mode, very useful to sketch some interaction concepts
280.
by khalic 6mo ago
While I agree with the general sentiment that this requires monitoring and study, the abstract is _very_ tendentious, lays multiple hypothesis as facts and doesn’t provide any measurement or alternatives to their preferred solution. This is
281.
by khalic 6mo ago
That's some really poor filing job :D but yeah custom tools is the way to go
282.
by khalic 6mo ago
The movement itself is consistently aligned with Tech Bros interests, the philosophical foundation is interesting, but the movement itself is quite problematic
283.
by khalic 6mo ago
Not directly, but very friendly to the movement and people in it.
284.
by khalic 6mo ago
Yeah the whole “rationalist” movement is full of those lying fks that use a thin veneer of fallacious logic and self aggrandising discourse to rationalise their hoarding of resources and bottomless greed. They’re very well established in Ba
285.
by khalic 6mo ago
Why are you framing this as the only solution? There are many many other ways to secure a guaranty
286.
by khalic 6mo ago
Which I addressed with the last sentence, if you think someone dose es special treatment, it’s even worse. What makes him special? That he’s rich?
287.
by khalic 6mo ago
It’s the logical conclusion to his statement, why should Satoshi be treated differently, given more privacy rights, only because he’s a billionaire? Or do you think that making an exception for him is the logical choice here?
288.
by khalic 6mo ago
So if something is legal = it’s what most people think. Holy fallacy
289.
by khalic 6mo ago
Oh really, there was a vote?
290.
by khalic 6mo ago
Most people… never a good sign when you have to bring out these two words
291.
by khalic 6mo ago
Lol you guys are really in a cult aren’t you? You’re implying that journalists should never out people that are too wealthy? Do you not see the massive red flag here?
292.
by khalic 6mo ago
That’s not how you use that kind of wealth. You take loans with the fortune as collateral… come on that’s pretty basic stuff
293.
by khalic 6mo ago
HN now has a massive boner for billionaires, everybody imagining they’ll become one someday. It’s pretty sad
294.
by khalic 6mo ago
Are you implying there is an inherent right for public figures to hide their wealth, “for security reasons”? WTF?
295.
by khalic 6mo ago
Give it a few years, or month. Tiny models are getting outrageously good
296.
by khalic 6mo ago
Cool stuff!! Knowing CSS, the road must have been full of headaches and compromises.
297.
by khalic 6mo ago
Oh good, if they built a lab, I’m sure they took the time the precisely define what they mean by super intelligence? Right? …
298.
by khalic 6mo ago
Yeah you’re trying to win an argument, I’m trying to find what’s true. I won’t lose time trying to understand what your tech poser logic is trying to piece together. Hiding your source is not how you secure software. It’s how you pretend to
299.
by khalic 6mo ago
Ah yes closed source software has such a great track record compared to open source security… lol You are wrong, if you need to hide your code for it to be secured, then it was never secure to begin with. But it’s a great way to give a fals
300.
by khalic 6mo ago
Security through obscurity is not a good strategy

More ›