3 ms·
Lol you guys are really in a cult aren’t you? You’re implying that journalists should never out people that are too wealthy? Do you not see the massive red flag
by khalic 6mo ago
Lol you guys are really in a cult aren’t you? You’re implying that journalists should never out people that are too wealthy? Do you not see the massive red flag here?
- rationalist 6mo agoI'm not reading your suggested implication at all in the other person's comment.
- khalic 6mo agoIt’s the logical conclusion to his statement, why should Satoshi be treated differently, given more privacy rights, only because he’s a billionaire? Or do you think that making an exception for him is the logical choice here?
- rationalist 6mo agoNo, it's not the logical conclusion of that statement. You're assuming and extrapolating. "this particular case" ≠ "never"
- khalic 6mo agoWhich I addressed with the last sentence, if you think someone dose es special treatment, it’s even worse. What makes him special? That he’s rich?
- rationalist 6mo ago("dose es" typo of "deserves"?) I don't have anything to add that isn't already argued in other comments in this thread. I'm just pointing out that your opinions are not logical derivations.