keeshawn

6 ms·

1.
by keeshawn 13y ago
Unfortunately that isn't really up to us, since in our society you have to work to survive until you die or retire. Until having no job means a livable lifestyle, most people have to consider real dollar values when considering educati
2.
by keeshawn 13y ago
Privacy pit?
3.
by keeshawn 13y ago
No. People are free to associate with whomever they wish. Just as Mozilla is free to appoint an anti-gay CEO, those of us who disagree with that direction are free to go elsewhere when we choose to contribute to an open-source project.
4.
by keeshawn 13y ago
Your colleges will only produce successful people in the sense that success can be directly correlated with income. There would be no point in doing anything else. Do you think that income-generating activities are the only purpose of educa
5.
by keeshawn 13y ago
I didn't even think you were talking about grants. Are you saying grants are responsible for high tuition costs? Without grants, the gap would have to be made up in student loans. What good would that do? It would simply make students
6.
by keeshawn 13y ago
Much like how slave owners worked the cotton fields themselves, with the superficial detail of the work having passed through the body of a slave first.
7.
by keeshawn 13y ago
I don't know anyone who gets free money for college, except for people who inherit their money or have rich parents. I feel like this is a really central part of your argument, and it doesn't hold water. Every cent we go into debt
8.
by keeshawn 13y ago
Different Universities exist for different purposes; often times multiple purposes at once. You can't run a research and educational system without administration. But as a student, I don't see gleaming new facilities or well-paid
9.
by keeshawn 13y ago
Download our app, and let us read your entire contact list and send out SMS messages as you, and read and post to Facebook as you, and do whatever else we want to anything for any reason. (Accept)
10.
by keeshawn 13y ago
Lessons learned from running an apparently moderately successful grocery chain in 1920s America.
11.
by keeshawn 13y ago
Why make good stuff when you can over-engineer and over-sell garbage?
12.
by keeshawn 13y ago
There are nuclear engineers, doctors, highly trained technicians, government agencies and regulatory bodies who handle cleaning up nuclear accidents. Untrained elderly people would not help at all. Remember the tsunami killed 20,000 people
13.
by keeshawn 13y ago
> This could be a good thing. I want to make it illegal for people to collect any kind of data of what I do on my property. If you want to come see, then you'll have to talk to my secretary and pay a million dollars for an exclusive
14.
by keeshawn 13y ago
The victims in this case are cows.
15.
by keeshawn 13y ago
My hypothetical rape dungeon is private property, too. I would expect my right to privacy is trumped by the general public's right to not have horrifying crimes committed. If you run an operation like this and someone blows a whistle,
16.
Idaho law criminalizes secretly filming on farms(america.aljazeera.com)
230 points by keeshawn 13y ago|134 comments
17.
by keeshawn 13y ago
You can't "disagree" about climate change any more than you can "disagree" about heliocentrism. Also, notice that we can have a discussion despite the fact that you just threw out an ad hominem.
18.
by keeshawn 13y ago
What's your point? Incidentally, what logical arguments would you recommend one use against people who have rejected science as a legitimate world view?
19.
by keeshawn 13y ago
These are climate change deniers... I don't think they are really interested in statements of fact.
20.
by keeshawn 13y ago
Reddit did position itself as the bastion of anything goes free speech... when the speech itself was child pornography.