kbr2000

14 ms·

91.
by kbr2000 6y ago
I'm using Fossil for this: https://fossil-scm.org/ Written by the SQLite author (and based on SQLite).
92.
by kbr2000 7y ago
By reading 'The art of computer programming' (Knuth) from cover to cover :) He'd be more than willing to listen to you then (according to his own words, ironically printed on the backcover of my copy of TAOCP).
93.
by kbr2000 7y ago
Tnx, that's nice. I like your 1 condition!
94.
by kbr2000 7y ago
It would be good practice to do so, when you are referring to a FQDN. Apart from that, to circumvent badly configured paywall filters?
95.
by kbr2000 7y ago
I might have some time this summer, feel free to contact and explain ;)
96.
by kbr2000 7y ago
You can use proc command in Tcl to replace existing commands and procedures, which gives you the possibility to implement different behaviour. An example that shows this: ~$ tclsh % rename while origwhile % proc while {args} {
97.
by kbr2000 7y ago
rsync went quite fine while transferring data (in the same situation as you describe), when taken care of some important bottlenecks (not running it over SSH, disabling compression on files that don't compress well, disabling full chec
98.
by kbr2000 7y ago
Tnx, that one I didn't know... You can drop another command as such: lsof |awk '($10 ~ /^\/home\//) {print $10}' |sort -u
99.
by kbr2000 7y ago
It's likely the only way to stay sane in a corporate environment. The problem is, you don't need much people practicing that, before it drags everyone down to the same niveau. You can choose to try to continue your quest into doin
100.
by kbr2000 7y ago
DRAAA := didn't read at all (again)
101.
by kbr2000 7y ago
It got a lot worse since 'devops' came around, in my experience. As an example: people started getting increasingly pissed off when proprietary software (unpackaged, but usually with a shell installation script) couldn't get
102.
by kbr2000 7y ago
Indeed, which is what they're doing here: the OP only posts RedHat fabrications like that in here...
103.
by kbr2000 7y ago
They don't see that as part of their job. On the short term that behaviour probably doesn't create problems for them. On the long term, they likely will be responding to job adverts themselves :) Anyway, no answer is sometimes pre
104.
by kbr2000 7y ago
Well, thank you a lot Randy! Great idea, good times... In case this interests someone, I recommend you to check out Jason Scott's BBS Documentary [ http://www.bbsdocumentary.com/ ], and while the DVDs sold out, it seems
105.
by kbr2000 7y ago
A management fad called dev-ops is what went wrong, before you could count on your sysadmin to take care of that :) Apart from that, not everything always makes sense to use in production without a good level of understanding --- and might
106.
by kbr2000 7y ago
Yes, and even two or three, not to put all your eggs in the same basket...
107.
by kbr2000 7y ago
Managers and C-levels surely have appetite for this. In the end it just degrades mostly to trial-and-error, which I'm sure is no problem because the people have to do the real work get sick of it and get replaced (sometimes voluntarily
108.
by kbr2000 7y ago
Correct. Also, they won't give you that money if they know your motivation is the will to fix things. The money flows instead to the ones who have receiving more money as their motivation.
109.
by kbr2000 7y ago
I experienced this several times as an employee. It becomes hard to stand when you realize that every positive contribution just results in more money being shoveled out of the window behind your back (mainly because of greed, inefficiency,
110.
by kbr2000 7y ago
Because... they dance the devops dance with their devop hats on! Security problems can be swiftly danced around until they actually surface, and can then be handled in the next round of "continuous delivery". It's also smart
111.
by kbr2000 7y ago
Debatable, but it might + save some network bandwidth in case of a sufficiently large/complex document - burn some extra energy client-side in case of a sufficiently large/complex document + allow some kind of interactive manipula
112.
by kbr2000 7y ago
This reminds me of Bob Widlar (linear IC pioneer) and his "hassler" device [ http://www.deceptology.com/2012-03/engineer-invents-device-t... ]. Enjoy!
113.
by kbr2000 7y ago
> Nuclear energy has the lowest death rate [...] Unfortunately, facts do not change our minds. arguably, it's not the right technology to solve these human problems then. for that you'll need one with the highest death rate pos
114.
by kbr2000 7y ago
As Awk is a pattern-matching language, you can simplify it to something like this: ps aux |awk '/what/ {print "kill " $2}' This will give you a list of kill commands you can review, before piping to |sh
115.
by kbr2000 7y ago
How does that work in practice? In order to page, you should find out if it is the code, and it is indeed broken. I'm guessing all tests passed, so that won't be of much help anymore neither... In reality, it would be a sysadmin
116.
by kbr2000 7y ago
In order to move to your destination, after vertical take-off you would then need to fall down a bit first in order to pick up speed before transitioning to gliding (to get wind over your wings, which provides lift to turn and fly in the ri
117.
by kbr2000 7y ago
It's soon time to invent nano- and pico-services, so everything gets to be scalable by default. That way we can finally stop bothering about first examining the problem domain at hand, and pull out all the stops at once -- looking busy
118.
by kbr2000 7y ago
It seems more likely to me that those "devops tools" only solve a small slice of the big sysadmin cheese, and not in a flexible way (one useful skill of sysadmins is being able to react on the spot to what's coming to them at
119.
by kbr2000 7y ago
I remember it included both a floppy disk and a diskette, so you could choose a suitable one for your system to boot from, and continue with the CDROM. (a 1x speed Mitsumi drive with manual sled loading[0] at the time) Booting directly fro
120.
by kbr2000 7y ago
https://panoptic.com/wiki/aolserver/Conf/Examples

More ›