kadoban

24 ms·

451.
by kadoban 2y ago
Fingers are not meant to have good strength or dexterity that direction. It would be very tiring, difficult and I'd assume would be easy to end up with RSI issues. Not to mention it's a bit hard to imagine what the device would lo
452.
by kadoban 2y ago
> In my experience, a shit game on steam will make 3 figures if you're lucky. A shit game on Switch will make four figures most of the time. Is that a good metric? Ideally shit games _should_ make very little money. Don't we wa
453.
by kadoban 2y ago
> They don’t seem to occur in a speculative fashion where “maybe this person can pay…”. For potentially tens of billions of dollars, I'm willing to bet that some criminals would make an exception.
454.
by kadoban 2y ago
Yes, but that is not the option presented in the US for sure.
455.
by kadoban 2y ago
Opposing automation is obvious. The people opposing it have nothing to gain, and everything to lose.
456.
by kadoban 2y ago
That's spelled out in the article thankfully, but yeah the headline makes it clear that I'm going to know ~everything in the article and it's just going to be annoying.
457.
by kadoban 2y ago
Yeah, I think that's likely. I was trying to find info about this type of case on google, but without luck. I'm also thinking that the cork probably also degraded some over the years, just becoming weaker and needing less to dislo
458.
by kadoban 2y ago
The danger in that story is pretty off the charts. That could have _easily_ led to death, like maybe 1/100? That's something parents _should_ stop. It could have been redirected to safer versions, you can have a lot of fun with lo
459.
by kadoban 2y ago
The pressure under significant amounts of water is _way_ higher than in air, raises with depth. The small amount of air in the bottles must have started close to 1 atmosphere of pressure (approx normal for just out in the air), but over tim
460.
by kadoban 2y ago
Any project I've been involved in has its own explicit license, that allows such things (really allows much more, I don't touch anything closed source).
461.
by kadoban 2y ago
> if wpengine is hoping to go into court and explain that wp is not related to wordpress, while selling wordpress services… i dont think its going to go well for them. Of course not. They will (if it goes that far) point out that their u
462.
by kadoban 2y ago
The WordPress trademark guides say explicitly that "WP" is allowed to be used by others. Several other parts of the wording the WP Engine uses are also explicitly allowed. So your whole first two paragraphs are mistaken.
463.
by kadoban 2y ago
That sounds like what `git add -p` is for, stage part of the current changes.
464.
by kadoban 2y ago
Seems a lot like that would be the other way around, copyright law overrules random company's policy.
465.
by kadoban 2y ago
Doesn't that just mean that Github should be mad at them? Doesn't seem obvious that it actually gives me a license to do anything.
466.
by kadoban 2y ago
Is the ToS a contract? Even if it is would the remedy to Winamp breaking it be modifying the license Winamp provides?
467.
by kadoban 2y ago
It's not clear that Github's ToS can do such a thing, is it? What gives them the right to overrule the license from Winamp to me?
468.
by kadoban 2y ago
Maybe. Nobody really knows what happens at the center. General relativity I believe says "yes", but nobody knows how true it is in the case of ~infinitely dense crap in an infinitely small spot. Usually "infinite" means
469.
by kadoban 2y ago
It's not a contradiction because the path of the light enters the black hole event horizon but does not come back out. All paths end at the ~center of the black hole. We don't really know what's there, at the so-called singul
470.
by kadoban 2y ago
I have the impression that their sales/renewal side is kind of nasty. I have a vanity domain for myself, and someone from their sales started cold-emailing me to sell me some crazy enterprise plan. After several being ignored they sent
471.
by kadoban 2y ago
It will gain energy. There _is_ no amount of energy it could gain to escape though. It goes no faster, gets no closer to escape. It just splats into the black hole and we'll never see it again no matter how much energy it started with
472.
by kadoban 2y ago
You prefer that they wrap it in an .msi file and put it on that same website? What do you think the advantages of that are?
473.
by kadoban 2y ago
Some of them would, some wouldn't, depends on where they were and how they were moving. This is a bit like asking why Jupiter isn't part of the Sun but other stuff is.
474.
by kadoban 2y ago
Probably the best outcome. Nicotine is a pretty potent poison, not sure how much is in vape juice though.
475.
by kadoban 2y ago
Usually, but it's not exclusively concentrated in exactly one person.
476.
by kadoban 2y ago
There seems to be no particular reason to expect exponential growth here to me. Can you explain why you'd expect that?
477.
by kadoban 2y ago
Doesn't that just mean they knew in advance they weren't making enough to pay the bills? Better than it being a surprise, but still not great.
478.
by kadoban 2y ago
Turing also just comes off like a bit of an antisocial asshole, and those around him are kind of dimwitted fools. Neither of those seem accurate based on anything else I've read of that time. He's a movie trope instead of a charac
479.
by kadoban 2y ago
There's tech that if it's not on your resume, you won't pass the first filter. But that's different. Knowing it will _not_ get you a job, it'll just get you past some early step. But things like TLA+ are way differe
480.
by kadoban 2y ago
It is an enjoyable movie, but I'd caution that it's _quite_ innacurate both about the history in general and about Turing in particular. The book is much better about both.

More ›