kadenshep

10 ms·

31.
by kadenshep 8y ago
>People are more rational when the cost to them of being irrational is larger. This was directly negated in the article.
32.
by kadenshep 8y ago
>nothing can redeem it and it's off topic on Hacker News. That seems largely contradictory to the hacker ethos, no?
33.
by kadenshep 8y ago
I've loved this aspect of CL. I often repeat a self-quote of mine (somewhat patronizingly) to my teams. Often times, it's not necessarily how something works, but how well it breaks. Things will break, so engineer for it. You&#x27
34.
by kadenshep 8y ago
Not only does it not make me a hypocrite, being a hypocrite has no bearing on the substance of the argument. Questioning motives is perfectly valid, especially when there is a preponderance of evidence to substantiate that question. Appeal
35.
by kadenshep 8y ago
Please elaborate? I presented an actual perspective. You have gone around these threads and insulted and demeaned people with a different opinion than the majority and then even equivocated these criticisms to a debate about a fictional cha
36.
by kadenshep 8y ago
You think it's okay to debase the chief of the rescue operation, ignore the advice he took from multiple teams, and cherry pick a personal email correspondence with one guy that basically just says "keep trying" just so Musk
37.
by kadenshep 8y ago
>Because your entire series of posts in this thread thus far have been nothing but questioning the motives of Elon Musk It's not a question. I quite literally detailed what factually has happened. It isn't up for debate. He aga
38.
by kadenshep 8y ago
Why?
39.
by kadenshep 8y ago
>There seems to be a large outspoken group of people who go out of their way to talk about Musk despite their apparent dislike of him I'm sorry what? Musk constantly gets tons of PR over nothing from news outlets, to reddit, to HN.
40.
by kadenshep 8y ago
No it hasn't. Industrial and scientific advancements are to be credited with this. Not asinine resource allocation systems, that have in fact needlessly let people die.
41.
by kadenshep 8y ago
So the guy actually in charge of the entire thing is somehow wrong, but Elon personally emailed exactly 1 person in charge of 1 team who said "keep working on it", which definitely justifies the entire surrounding PR bonanza and M
42.
by kadenshep 8y ago
OP would need to elaborate on why it would in the first place. Bald assertions need only be met with bald assertions, especially when those assertions have real world examples negating them.
43.
by kadenshep 8y ago
No it wouldn't.
44.
by kadenshep 8y ago
You are being silly. You completely misread what I said and bnw you're attempting to reference insanely improbable scenarios. Just point out the exact part of the law you guys are having a problem with. If you can't do that, it&#x
45.
by kadenshep 8y ago
What part of "super fuzzy high level overview" was confusing?
46.
by kadenshep 8y ago
Oh lord speaking of copyright law, trying to rationally discuss Copyright law during the Oracle vs Google case on this site was basically an exercise in how much mental pain you were wiling to take. Comments that only contained direct quote
47.
by kadenshep 8y ago
Let me just respond to this in short: No. They're not circular. The same vague claims keep getting repeated, with absolutely nothing to back them up. Not even a "here's the problem with the law in our case" super fuzzy h
48.
by kadenshep 8y ago
There isn't anything in GDPR to cause the problems he is describing. It's realistically the most probable scenario. If I'm not allowed to call out dishonesty then there's basically no point in discussing any subject.
49.
by kadenshep 8y ago
This is the exact opposite experience we've had. We're all over Europe and the U.S. It was pretty painless. Our business does not rely on the ignorance of users or the abuse of their privacy. What "army of lawyers" did y
50.
by kadenshep 8y ago
We can work on figuring out all of those in parallel.
51.
by kadenshep 8y ago
I mean, what wording confused this concept specifically?
52.
by kadenshep 8y ago
You're ignoring how most users need things in front of their face. Most users are not privacy or security "aware" in any manner. Putting it in the UI or actively promoting these services is beneficial to the common web user.
53.
by kadenshep 8y ago
If only there was some sort of organization that workers could collectively be apart of and contribute to. An organization dedicated to worker's rights, an organization that would make sure whimsical decisions couldn't aversely af
54.
by kadenshep 8y ago
They tried a moderation system. An active and passive moderation system. Conservatives in the U.S. claimed it was "biased" so they stopped. Despite the fact that Facebook had clear records about disinformation campaigns and how un
55.
by kadenshep 8y ago
There's nothing secret about hiring people who can think rationally and morally. It's typically part of the interview H/R screening process.
56.
by kadenshep 8y ago
Do yourself a favor and re-read my post. And yes. It's an agreed upon view point.
57.
by kadenshep 8y ago
Yeah, this is an incredibly unordinary talking point and it's not honest. At the very least it's just troll bait. "I hope your org gets sued." For what, not hiring crazy racist people? It's okay to call a spade a sp
58.
by kadenshep 8y ago
My employer knows two things about me: A) I will not work on/for military/defense products/clients, unless there is some blatantly obvious noble characteristic about the project (I come from a background in video analytics).
59.
by kadenshep 8y ago
It's a framework for exploring this issue. It's largely done to frame the topic and explore what solutions we can employ to stop "truth decay" from happening. It's partly for future research/researchers and par
60.
by kadenshep 8y ago
Link to the full paper (PDF): https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/...

More ›